ArticleSN comprehensive clinical medicine2021
Physicians' Dilemma of False-Positive RT-PCR for COVID-19: a Case Report.
Article in SN comprehensive clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The potential of circulating microRNAs as novel diagnostic biomarkers of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer.Archives of virology · 2024Article
- Conventional and Novel Diagnostic Tools for the Diagnosis of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Vaccines · 2023Review
- The Capacity of Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Response: A Review in Context of COVID-19 Screening and Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Assessing the Impact of Meteorological Factors on COVID-19 Seasonality in Metropolitan Chennai, India.Toxics · 2022Article
- Graphite nanocrystals coated paper-based electrode for detection of SARS-Cov-2 gene using DNA-functionalized Au@carbon dot core-shell nanoparticles.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of Algorithms to Identify COVID-19 Patients Using a US Electronic Health Records Database: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- A complete framework for accurate recognition and prognosis of COVID-19 patients based on deep transfer learning and feature classification approach.Artificial intelligence review · 2022Article
- UK ethnic minority healthcare workers' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK ethnic minority community: A qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Performance and usefulness of a novel automated immunoassay HISCL SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay kit for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Societal Criticism towards COVID-19: Assessing the Theory of Self-Diagnosis Contrasted to Medical Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Survey of Using Machine Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing.Case reports in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has played havoc on this world's health and economics since its outbreak in December 2019. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been the gold standard to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Still, few false-positive reports are emerging up that add to the physicians' dilemma and maintenance of health statistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.