Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426439›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2020

Recurrent seizures in a young woman: when video-EEG diagnoses a cardiac cause: a case report.

Corentin Chaumont, Julie Bourilhon, Nathalie Chastan, Adrian Mirolo, Hélène Eltchaninoff, Frédéric Anselme

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corentin ChaumontDepartment of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7188-2686
Julie BourilhonDepartment of Neurology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
Nathalie ChastanDepartment of Neurology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
Adrian MiroloDepartment of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3979-0594
Hélène EltchaninoffDepartment of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
Frédéric AnselmeDepartment of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2130-9790
Université de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile transient loss of consciousness is a frequent presenting symptom, differential diagnosis between syncope and epilepsy can be challenging. Misdiagnosis of epilepsy leads to important psychosocial consequences and eliminates the opportunity to treat patient's true condition. CASE SUMMARY: A 39-year-old woman presenting with recurrent seizures since her childhood was referred to neurological consultation. Electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetic resonance imaging previously performed were normal. A sleep-deprived video-EEG was performed and highlighted after 12 h of sleep deprivation a progressive dropping of the heart rate followed by a complete heart block without ventricular escape rhythm and asystole for about 30 s. Her EEG recording later showed diffuse slow waves traducing a global cerebral dysfunction and suffering. The diagnosis of vaso-vagal syncope with predominant cardioinhibitory response was made and a dual-chamber pacemaker with rate-drop response algorithm was implanted. After a 2 years of follow-up, the patient remained free of syncope. DISCUSSION: Patients presenting with loss of consciousness and convulsion are often diagnosed with epilepsy despite normal EEGs. In patients presenting with recurrent seizures with unclear diagnosis of epilepsy or in a situation of drug-resistant epilepsy, syncope diagnosis should always be considered and a risk stratification is necessary. The benefit of pacemaker implantation in patients with recurrent vaso-vagal syncope is still very controversial. Only patients presenting with spontaneous asystole should be considered for pacemaker implantation in case of recurrent vaso-vagal syncope.

Indexed as

Cardiac pacingCase reportEpilepsySeizuresVaso-vagal syncopeVideo-EEG

Identifiers

PMID33426439
PMCPMC7780438
OpenAlexW3103176206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.