Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426345›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2020

Patterns of item score and total score distributions on depression rating scales in the general population: evidence and mechanisms.

Shinichiro Tomitaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shinichiro TomitakaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that item scores and total scores on depression rating scales exhibit common distribution shapes in a general population. Specifically, responses to depressive symptom items show a proportional relationship between response options, except for the lower end option, whereas total scores exhibit an exponential distribution, except for the lower end of the distribution. The common mathematical distributions of item scores and total scores may help explain the scoring mechanism of a depression rating scale. This paper, therefore, discusses how the distribution shapes are generated. Two conditions are assumed: (1) each individual's latent degree of depression forms an exponential distribution in a general population, and (2) the threshold of each depressive symptom forms a normal distribution. A simulation study applying the two assumptions revealed that simulated total scores follow an exponential distribution through a strong linear relationship between an individual's latent trait of depression and simulated total scores. Furthermore, the strong linear relationship between total scores and the individual's latent trait of depression supports the prevailing view that total scores on a Likert type scale tend toward interval data. Regarding item scores, an analysis of boundary curves, which divide the distribution of total scores by each item score, revealed that the lower end option and the next option distances have a trade-off relationship, and the remaining option distances have a proportional relationship across all items. In conclusion, the assumption that a latent trait of depression follows an exponential distribution helps explain the mathematical pattern of item response and total score distribution. Furthermore, the item score and total score distribution shapes on depression rating scales may serve as evidence of the level of measurement.

Indexed as

Depression rating scalesExponential distributionItem responseLatent traitLevel of measurementLikert scalesMathematical distribution

Identifiers

PMID33426345
PMCPMC7777072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.