Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426305›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2020

Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A multicenter comparative study of the World Health Organization and fracture risk assessment tool criteria.

Ju-Yang Jung, Sang Tae Choi, Sung-Hoon Park, Seong-Ryul Kwon, Hyoun-Ah Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Sang Hyon Kim, Chang-Hee Suh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ju-Yang JungDepartment of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sang Tae ChoiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hoon ParkDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Ryul KwonDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Hyoun-Ah KimDepartment of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Soo KimDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hyon KimDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Hee SuhDepartment of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Ajou University · KRGangneung Asan Hospital · KRChung-Ang University · KRInha University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOsteoporosis and fracture are known complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We assessed the prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in patients with SLE.

methodsA total of 155 female SLE patients were recruited retrospectively in 5 university hospitals. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) for high-risk osteoporotic fractures was calculated with and without BMD.

resultsThe mean age was 53.7 ± 6.8 years, and osteoporotic fractures were detected in 19/127 (15.0%) patients. The proportion of patients having a high-risk for osteoporotic fractures in the FRAX with and without BMD, and osteoporosis by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were 25 (16.1%), 24 (15.5%), and 51 (32.9%), respectively, and 48.0-68.6% of them were receiving treatment. On multivariate logistic analysis, nephritis (odds ratio [OR] 11.35) and cumulative dose of glucocorticoid (OR 1.1) were associated with high-risk by the FRAX with BMD, and low complement levels (OR 4.38), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (OR 1.04), and cumulative dose of glucocorticoid (OR 1.05) were associated with osteoporosis by the WHO criteria in patients with SLE.

conclusionsAmong Korean female patients with SLE, the proportion of patients having a high-risk of osteoporotic fractures by the FRAX tool was 15.5%-16.1% and the proportion of patients having osteoporosis by the WHO criteria was 32.9%. In SLE, nephritis, low level of complement, ESR, and cumulative dose of glucocorticoids may contribute to fracture risk.

Indexed as

Bone mineral densityFractureFracture risk assessment toolOsteoporosisSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID33426305
PMCPMC7783110
OpenAlexW3107225524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.