Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426014›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Marco Roller, Sören Hansen, Tobias Knauf-Witzens, Walter M R Oelemann, Claus-Peter Czerny, Ahmed Abd El Wahed, Ralph Goethe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. High Molecular Diversity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Large-scale serological survey onFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Molecular Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. The Many Hosts of Mycobacteria 9 (MHM9): A conference report.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  12. First identification ofVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Serological Survey of Paratuberculosis in the Polish European Bison (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco RollerZoological-Botanical Gardens Wilhelma, Stuttgart, Germany.
Sören HansenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Division of Microbiology and Animal Hygiene, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Tobias Knauf-WitzensZoological-Botanical Gardens Wilhelma, Stuttgart, Germany.
Walter M R OelemannInstitute for Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Claus-Peter CzernyDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Division of Microbiology and Animal Hygiene, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ahmed Abd El WahedDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Division of Microbiology and Animal Hygiene, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ralph GoetheInstitute for Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Johne's diseaseMAPMycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosisnon-ruminantsparatuberculosisruminatszoo animals

Identifiers

PMID33426014
PMCPMC7785982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.