Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426012›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Financial Impacts of Liver Fluke on Livestock Farms Under Climate Change-A Farm Level Assessment.

Shailesh Shrestha, Alyson Barratt, Naomi J Fox, Bouda Vosough Ahmadi, Mike R Hutchings

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular identification ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Farm resilience to climatic risk. A review.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shailesh ShresthaDepartment of Rural Economy, Environment and Society, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alyson BarrattDepartment of Rural Economy, Environment and Society, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Naomi J FoxAnimal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Bouda Vosough AhmadiThe European Commission for the Control of Foot and Mouth Disease (EuFMD), Animal Production and Health Division (AGAH), Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Mike R HutchingsAnimal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Scotland's Rural College · GBFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver fluke infection (fascioliasis) is a parasitic disease which affects the health and welfare of ruminants. It is a concern for the livestock industry and is considered as a growing threat to the industry because changing climatic conditions are projected to be more favorable to increased frequency and intensity of liver fluke outbreaks. Recent reports highlighted that the incidence and geographic range of liver fluke has increased in the UK over the last decade and estimated to increase the average risk of liver fluke in the UK due to increasing temperature and rainfall. This paper explores financial impacts of the disease with and without climate change effects on Scottish livestock farms using a farm-level economic model. The model is based on farming system analysis and uses linear programming technique to maximize farm net profit within farm resources. Farm level data from a sample of 160 Scottish livestock farms is used under a no disease baseline scenario and two disease scenarios (with and without climate change). These two disease scenarios are compared with the baseline scenario to estimate the financial impact of the disease at farm levels. The results suggest a 12% reduction in net profit on an average dairy farm compared to 6% reduction on an average beef farm under standard disease conditions. The losses increase by 2-fold on a dairy farm and 6-fold on a beef farm when climate change effects are included with disease conditions on farms. There is a large variability within farm groups with profitable farms incurring relatively lesser economic losses than non-profitable farms. There is a substantial increase in number of vulnerable farms both in dairy (+20%) and beef farms (+27%) under the disease alongside climate change conditions.

Indexed as

climate changeeconomic impact studyfarm level modelingliver flukelivestock farms

Identifiers

PMID33426012
PMCPMC7793977
OpenAlexW3113078594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.