ArticleFrontiers in medicine2020
Development and Use of Gene Therapy Orphan Drugs-Ethical Needs for a Broader Cooperation Between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Society.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of managed entry agreements to reduce reimbursement challenges of orphan medicinal products: the development of a matrix.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the Early Economic Feasibility of a Curative Gene Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis Using a Risk-Adjusted Valuation Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Progress in Gene Therapy for Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type 1.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Towards ethical drug pricing: the European Orphan Genomic Therapies Fund.Gene therapy · 2024Review
- Challenges for gene therapy in the financial sustainability of health systems: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Navigating Gene Therapy Access: The Case of Bulgaria in the Context of the EU Regulatory Landscape.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Gene therapy for selected neuromuscular and trinucleotide repeat disorders - An insight to subsume South Asia for multicenter clinical trials.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2023Article
- Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Utilization of genetic information for medicines development and equitable benefit sharing.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Making Sure That Orphan Incentives Tip the Right Way in Europe.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Addressing the implementation gap in advanced therapeutics for spinal muscular atrophy in the era of newborn screening programs.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Novel vectors and approaches for gene therapy in liver diseases.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021Review
- Clinical Trial Design for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Genetic Epilepsies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene therapy orphan medicinal products constitute a unique group of new drugs which in case of hereditary diseases are usually administered only once at an early age, in the hope to provide sufficient gene product to last for the entire life of the patients. The combination of an exceptionally large single payment and the life-long clinical follow-up needed for understanding the long-term benefits and safety of gene therapy, represent new types of scientific, financial, social and ethical challenges for the pharmaceutical industry, regulators and society. With special consideration of the uniqueness and importance of gene therapy, the authors propose a three points plan for a close cooperation between the pharmaceutical industry and society to develop orphan gene therapy. (1) In fully transparent health technology negotiations a close and long-lasting, contractually fixed cooperation should be established between the manufacturers and local health-care stakeholders for sharing the medical and scientific benefits, the financial risks as well as the burdens of the post-authorization clinical and regulatory development. (2) The parties should agree on a fair, locally affordable drug price without the usually very high premium price calculated to compensate for the low number of patients. In case of high manufacturing costs, the companies should offer prolonged, 15-20 years long payment by installment with risk-sharing, especially considering that the late outcome of the treatment is unknown. Society should assist scientifically and financially organizing a specific patient registry, treatment in specialized hospitals and adequate long-term follow-up of patients, the coordinated management of financial transactions related to the risk sharing program. (3) The post-authorization treatment and prolonged observation of additional new cases coordinated by society should provide real world data needed for the modern complex regulatory evaluation of gene therapy products by the competent authorities. We assume that fair sharing of the benefits and risks as well as a well-organized cooperation of society with the industry in collecting real world evidence might result in better drug evaluation and improved accessibility due to lower prices. The outlined concept might support gene therapy more efficiently than the presently requested outstandingly high prices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.