Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425952›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2020

Development and Use of Gene Therapy Orphan Drugs-Ethical Needs for a Broader Cooperation Between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Society.

Sandor Kerpel-Fronius, Varvara Baroutsou, Sander Becker, Roberto Carlesi, Luis Collia, Brigitte Franke-Bray, Peter Kleist, Chieko Kurihara, Luis Filipe Laranjeira, Kotone Matsuyama and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel vectors and approaches for gene therapy in liver diseases.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021
    Review
  13. Clinical Trial Design for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Genetic Epilepsies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sandor Kerpel-FroniusDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Varvara BaroutsouIndependent Medical Consultant & Pharmaceutical Medicine Consultant, Athens, Greece.
Sander BeckerConsultants in Pharmaceutical Medicine, Dover Heights, NSW, Australia.
Roberto CarlesiIndependent Researcher, Bellagio, Italy.
Luis ColliaCraveri Pharma, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Brigitte Franke-BrayIndependent Consultant, Basel, Switzerland.
Peter KleistCantonal Ethics Committee, Zurich, Switzerland.
Chieko KuriharaQuality Assurance and Audit Office, Quantum Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Luis Filipe LaranjeiraEli Lilly & Co., Lisbon, Portugal.
Kotone MatsuyamaNippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Shehla NaseemFerozsons Laboratories Ltd., Karachi, Pakistan.
Johanna SchenkPPH Plus GmbH & Co. KG, Hochheim am Main, Germany.
Honorio SilvaIFAPP Academy, New York, NY, United States.
Athens Medical Center · GRNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology · JPNippon Medical School · JPOspedale Bellaria · ITSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy orphan medicinal products constitute a unique group of new drugs which in case of hereditary diseases are usually administered only once at an early age, in the hope to provide sufficient gene product to last for the entire life of the patients. The combination of an exceptionally large single payment and the life-long clinical follow-up needed for understanding the long-term benefits and safety of gene therapy, represent new types of scientific, financial, social and ethical challenges for the pharmaceutical industry, regulators and society. With special consideration of the uniqueness and importance of gene therapy, the authors propose a three points plan for a close cooperation between the pharmaceutical industry and society to develop orphan gene therapy. (1) In fully transparent health technology negotiations a close and long-lasting, contractually fixed cooperation should be established between the manufacturers and local health-care stakeholders for sharing the medical and scientific benefits, the financial risks as well as the burdens of the post-authorization clinical and regulatory development. (2) The parties should agree on a fair, locally affordable drug price without the usually very high premium price calculated to compensate for the low number of patients. In case of high manufacturing costs, the companies should offer prolonged, 15-20 years long payment by installment with risk-sharing, especially considering that the late outcome of the treatment is unknown. Society should assist scientifically and financially organizing a specific patient registry, treatment in specialized hospitals and adequate long-term follow-up of patients, the coordinated management of financial transactions related to the risk sharing program. (3) The post-authorization treatment and prolonged observation of additional new cases coordinated by society should provide real world data needed for the modern complex regulatory evaluation of gene therapy products by the competent authorities. We assume that fair sharing of the benefits and risks as well as a well-organized cooperation of society with the industry in collecting real world evidence might result in better drug evaluation and improved accessibility due to lower prices. The outlined concept might support gene therapy more efficiently than the presently requested outstandingly high prices.

Indexed as

accelerated approvaldrug pricingethicsgene therapyhealth careorphan drugsrare diseasesspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID33425952
PMCPMC7785873
OpenAlexW3114779957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.