Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425829›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2020

Everyday Walking Among Older Adults and the Neighborhood Built Environment: A Comparison Between Two Cities in North America.

Florian Herbolsheimer, Atiya Mahmood, Yvonne L Michael, Habib Chaudhury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Race and Ethnicity Differences in Walking and Associations with Neighborhood Perceptions among Older Adults in California.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian HerbolsheimerDepartment of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Atiya MahmoodDepartment of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yvonne L MichaelDornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Habib ChaudhuryDepartment of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Simon Fraser University · CADrexel University · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A walkable neighborhood becomes particularly important for older adults for whom physical activity and active transportation are critical for healthy aging-in-place. For many older adults, regular walking takes place in the neighborhood and is the primary mode of mobility. This study took place in eight neighborhoods in Metro Portland (USA) and Metro Vancouver (Canada), examining older adults' walking behavior and neighborhood built environmental features. Older adults reported walking for recreation and transport in a cross-sectional telephone survey. Information on physical activity was combined with audits of 355 street segments using the Senior Walking Environmental Audit Tool-Revised (SWEAT-R). Multi-level regression models examined the relationship between built environmental characteristics and walking for transport or recreation. Older adults [

Indexed as

Environment DesignWalkingCanadaCitiesCross-Sectional StudiesNorth Americabuilt environmentneighborhoodolder adultsphysical activitywalking

Identifiers

PMID33425829
PMCPMC7793713
OpenAlexW3117721451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.