Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425796›Full record

ArticleProstate international2020

Factors affecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with positive and negative surgical margin.

Serdar Celik, Anıl Eker, İbrahim Halil Bozkurt, Deniz Bolat, İsmail Basmacı, Ertuğrul Şefik, Tansu Değirmenci, Bülent Günlüsoy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serdar CelikHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
Anıl EkerHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
İbrahim Halil BozkurtHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
Deniz BolatHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
İsmail BasmacıHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
Ertuğrul ŞefikHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
Tansu DeğirmenciHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
Bülent GünlüsoyHealth Science University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Izmir, Turkey.
Izmir University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the clinical and pathological predictive factors affecting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with positive and negative surgical margin (SM).

methodsPatients who underwent RP were retrospectively reviewed for the study. Demographic, clinical, pathological and oncological data were evaluated. All data were compared between patients with positive SM and negative SM to detect factors associated with SM status. Later, patients were divided into two groups as BCR-negative and BCR-positive groups. Data were separately compared between BCR groups for all patients, SM-negative and SM-positive patients, respectively.

resultsA total of 254 patients with a mean age of 63.5 years and the mean prostate-specific antigen of 10.9 ng/ml were evaluated in the study. SM positivity was found to be an independent prognostic factor for BCR (p = 0.013, Odds Ratio (OR): 0.267, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.094-0.755). In SM-positive patients, biopsy Gleason Score and International Society of Urological Pathology grade were found to be independent predictive factors for BCR (p < 0.05). However, only tumor to SM distance (TSMD) was found to be an independent risk factor for BCR (p = 0.024) in SM-negative patients. The predictive cutoff value of the TSMD was found to be 75 μm for BCR (100% sensitivity and 63.9% specificity) (AUC = 0.803, p = 0.024). Although all of 46 patients with >75 μm TSMD were recurrence free, 5 of 31 patients with <75 μm TSMD had BCR (p = 0.009; OR: 0.839 CI: 0.719-0.979).

conclusionHigh Gleason Score and International Society of Urological Pathology grade of biopsy were found to be associated with BCR in SM-positive patients. For SM-negative patients, only TSMD was found to be associated with BCR after RP.

Indexed as

biochemical recurrenceprostate cancersurgical margin positivitytumor to surgical margin distance (TSMD)

Identifiers

PMID33425796
PMCPMC7767941
OpenAlexW3087105665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.