ArticleProstate international2020
Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia-related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity.
Article in Prostate international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective observational study of oxidative stress in the pathology of benign prostatic hyperplasia with bladder diverticulum.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Prostate diseases and microbiome in the prostate, gut, and urine.Prostate international · 2022Review
- Evolving Role of Silodosin for the Treatment of Urological Disorders - A Narrative Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
- Changes in diagnosis rate and treatment trends of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Korea: A nationwide population-based cohort study.Prostate international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare once daily (QD) usage of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin in patients divided as those with moderate and with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) according to International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) categories in terms of effectiveness and adverse events.
methodsA total of 234 patients aged ≥ 40 years were evaluated prospectively. All participants were divided firstly into two groups according to their IPSS severity as moderate and severe. They were further allocated to receive 4 mg of silodosin and 8 mg of silodosin QD. Demographic features and laboratory tests were recorded. The patients were questioned with International Index of Erectile Function-5 and IPSS along with quality of life index. Uroflowmetric measurements were applied to the patients. All tests and measurements were repeated at the 3rd month, and changes from pretreatment to posttreatment were analyzed by SPSS 21.0 Program. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
resultsBoth treatments provided benefit in patients with both moderate and severe LUTSs. While results did not differ among 4 mg and 8 mg of silodosin in patients with moderate LUTSs, 8 mg of silodosin was significantly better than 4mg in those with severe LUTSs in terms of improvement of the total IPSS, IPSS voiding subtotal score, and quality of life score (p = 0.015, 0.030, <0.001, respectively). Both treatments did not affect erectile functions. Adverse events were seen more frequently in patients receiving 8 mg of silodosin than those treated with 4 mg of silodosin (p = 0.024).
conclusionOur study revealed that 4 mg of silodosin QD was as effective as 8 mg of silodosin QD in patients with moderate LUTSs but not with severe LUTSs. It can be inferred from this study that prescription of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin may be chosen to treat the patients with moderate and severe LUTSs due to benign prostatic heperplasia, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.