SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2020
Long-Term Outcomes of Treosulfan- vs. Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treosulfan or busulfan plus clofarabine as reduced intensity conditioning regimen before allotransplant for adults with myeloid malignancies.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with AML and MDS: navigating risks and optimizing outcomes.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- Treosulfan-Based Conditioning in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Reduced-Intensity Fludarabine, Busulfan and Anti-T-Lymphocyte Globulin With Strategic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Older Patients With Myeloid Malignancy.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Low rates of endothelial cell dysfunction and transplant-related mortality in 537 children receiving fludarabine-treosulfan conditioning for all transplant indications: A retrospective multicentre study on behalf of the UK Paediatric BMT group.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Dyskeratosis Congenita with Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Blood cell therapy · 2025Article
- Treosulfan is a safe and effective alternative to busulfan for conditioning in adult allogeneic HSCT patients: Data from a single center.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Cyclophosphamide Pharmacogenomic Variation in Cancer Treatment and Its Effect on Bioactivation and Pharmacokinetics.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Review
- Survival advantage of treosulfan plus fludarabine (FT14) compared to busulfan plus fludarabine (FB4) in active acute myeloid leukemia post allogeneic transplantation: an analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP).Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Article
- Busulfan or Treosulfan Conditioning Platform for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged >60 Y With Acute Myeloid Leukemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Subanalysis of the GITMO AlloEld Study.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Comparative study of treosulfan plus Fludarabine (FT14) with busulfan plus Fludarabine (FB4) for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission: An analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP).Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany studies aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) compared with other regimens, but different outcomes were reported across studies.
aimTo determine the long-term survival outcomes of treosulfan-based vs. busulfan-based conditioning regimens in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for studies published prior to December 6, 2019. The fixed-effects model was applied for overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). Relapse incidence (RI) was pooled by the use of the random-effects model.
resultsSix studies were included (3,982 patients; range, 57-1,956). The pooled HR for OS favored treosulfan (HR=0.80, 95%CI: 0.71-0.90). There was no significant difference in NRM between the two regimens (HR=0.84, 95%CI=0.71-1.01). There was no significant difference in LFS between the two regimens (HR=0.98, 95%CI=0.87-1.12). Treosulfan-based regimens showed a lower risk of aGvHD (HR=0.70, 95%CI=0.59-0.82), but there was no difference for cGvHD (HR=0.94, 95%CI=0.81-1.09). There was no significant difference in RI between the two regimens (HR=0.96, 95%CI=0.71-1.31). There was no publication bias among these studies.
conclusionThe current meta-analysis determined that treosulfan-based conditioning regimens could improve the OS in patients with MDS and AML, with lower acute graft-versus-host disease incidence, compared with busulfan-based regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.