ArticleCureus2020
Return to Work Guidelines Following Neurosurgical Procedures.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive factors for satisfaction with surgery following anterior posterior same day spinal fusion.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Rates of cervical spine surgery and repeat epidural injections after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for patients with cervical radiculopathy utilizing a large national database.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Therapeutic exercise following lumbar spine surgery: a narrative review.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Discrepancies in recommendations for return to regular activities after cervical spine surgery: A survey study.North American Spine Society journal · 2024Article
- Targeted Delivery of Abaloparatide to Spinal Fusion Site Accelerates Fusion Process in Rats.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Postoperative recommendations for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a cross-section survey.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovery time following surgical procedures is a consideration every practicing surgeon must deliberate upon throughout his or her career. The decision to restrict patients from returning to work or various activities encountered on a daily basis following an operation is dependent on many factors. Surgeons must take into account patient population, individual comorbid conditions, complexity and length of surgery, immediate postoperative course, and baseline functional abilities. Thus, returning to work and various activities, including physical activity, work-related activity, and recreational activity alike, following invasive procedures is individualized from patient to patient. Most spinal procedures are performed by neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons. This article suggests a framework to guide appropriate return to work and activity escalation time frames following various spinal procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.