Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425532›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Recurrence Rate of Giant Cell Tumor With the Treatment of Scooping Curettage, Burr Down Technique, Phenolization, and Bone Cement.

Syed Faraz Ul Hassan Shah Gillani, Yasir Iqbal, Muhammad Taqi, Tauseef Ahmad Blouch, Muhammad Iqbal, Abubakar Siddiq

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Rare Case of Giant Cell tumor of Bone in Distal Tibia.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Syed Faraz Ul Hassan Shah GillaniOrthopedic Surgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Yasir IqbalOrthopedics, Swat Medical Complex and Teaching Hospital, Swat, PAK.
Muhammad TaqiOrthopedic Surgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Tauseef Ahmad BlouchOrthopedics and Traumatology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad IqbalOrthopedics and Traumatology, Swat Medical Complex and Teaching Hospital, Swat, PAK.
Abubakar SiddiqOrthopedics and Traumatology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Mayo Hospital · PKKing Edward Medical University · PKLahore General Hospital · PKMayo Hospital · THUniversity of Swat · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo find the recurrence and outcomes of giant cell tumors treated with scooping curettage, burr down technique, phenolization, and bone cement.

methodWe conducted a descriptive case series using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique at the Department of Orthopedics, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from May 2014 to June 2018. A total of 40 patients aged between 20 to 40 years with Compannacci grade I, II & III giant cell tumors (GCT) were included and patients unfit for the surgery, those with multiple, recurrent, malignant giant cell tumors, tumors involving the axial skeleton, and previously treated cases were excluded. We recorded the side, site of the tumor, post-operative distal neurovascular status, and recurrence of giant cell tumors. The patients were follow-up in the out-patient department (OPD) at the second week, fourth week, 12th week, 24th week, 48th week, 96th week, and 144th week after the surgery. Side, site of the tumor, and post-operative distal neurovascular status were assessed clinically, and recurrence of the tumors was observed clinically and radiologically.

resultsThe mean age of all patients was 25.75±5.74 years. Males were 45% (18) and females were 55% (22). Most (12, 30%) tumors were present in the upper limb, and 22 (70%) were present in the lower limb. The majority (24, 60%) tumors were present around the knee joint. Companacci grade I was five (12.5%), grade II was 14 (35%), and grade III was 21 (52%). There were six (15%) pathological fractures. There was no case of distal neurovascular (DNV) injury, and three patients had a recurrence in two years of follow-up.

conclusionGiant cell tumor treated with scooping curettage, burr down technique, phenolization and poly-methyl methacrylate showed 7.5% recurrence. The combined use of local adjuvants in the treatment of giant cell tumors is a safe and effective way to reduce the rate of local recurrence.

Indexed as

bone cementingburr downgct recurrencegct treatmentgiant cell curettagephenolizationscooping curettage

Identifiers

PMID33425532
PMCPMC7788055
OpenAlexW3113110038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.