Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425388›Full record

ArticleMinimally invasive surgery2020

Endoscopic Double-Pigtail Catheter (EDPC) Internal Drainage as First-Line Treatment of Gastric Leak: A Case Series during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Learning Curve for Morbid Obesity.

Gianni Lazzarin, Marino Di Furia, Lucia Romano, Alessandra Di Sibio, Carla Di Giacomo, Loreto Lombardi, Antonio Giuliani, Mario Schietroma, Beatrice Pessia, Francesco Carlei and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Minimally invasive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gianni LazzarinDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-6046
Marino Di FuriaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3175-2083
Lucia RomanoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-4490
Alessandra Di SibioDepartment of Radiology, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-5817
Carla Di GiacomoSurgical Endoscopy Unit, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7641-6358
Loreto LombardiSurgical Endoscopy Unit, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-0883
Antonio GiulianiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-7155
Mario SchietromaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2698-5501
Beatrice PessiaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-671X
Francesco CarleiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
Michele MarcheseSurgical Endoscopy Unit, ASL1 Abruzzo, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2155-6844
San Salvatore Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe prevalence of morbid obesity has dramatically increased over the last several decades worldwide, currently reaching epidemic proportions. Gastric leak (GL) remains the potentially fatal main complication after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for morbid obesity. To our knowledge, there are no standardized guidelines for GL treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) yet. The aim of this study was to represent our institutional preliminary experience using the endoscopic double-pigtail catheter (EDPC) as the method of internal drainage and propose it as first-line treatment in case of GL after LSG.

methodsOne hundred and seventeen patients were admitted to our surgical department and underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbid obesity from March 2014 to June 2019. In 5 patients (4.3%) of our series, GL occurred as a complication of LSG. EPDC was the stand-alone procedure of internal drainage and GL first-line treatment. The internal pig tail was endoscopically removed from 30

resultsPresent data (clinical, biochemical, and instrumental tests) showed a complete resolution of GL, with promotion of a pseudodiverticula and complete re-epithelialization of leak. Follow-up was more strict than usual (clinical visit and biochemical test on 7

conclusionThis was a preliminary retrospective observational study, conducted on 5 patients affected by GL as a complication of LSG for morbid obesity. EDPC maintains the safety, efficacy, and nonexpensive characteristic and may be proposed as better first-line treatment in case of GL after bariatric surgery.

Identifiers

PMID33425388
PMCPMC7775182
OpenAlexW3115183232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.