Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425328›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2020

Geospatial variations in trends of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition indicators at block level in Bihar, India, during scale-up of

Safa Abdalla, Emma Pair, Kala M Mehta, Victoria C Ward, Gary L Darmstadt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02726230 (Bihar Family Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02726230 nacompletednot on this map

Bihar Family Health Initiative (Ananya)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled27,633ConditionsMaternal and Child HealthArmsAnanya
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Learning fromJournal of global health · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Safa AbdallaDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Emma PairDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Kala M MehtaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Victoria C WardDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Gary L DarmstadtDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeographical variations in the levels and trajectory of health indicators at local level can inform the adaptation of interventions and development of targeted approaches for efficient scale-up of intervention impact. We examined the hypothesis that time trends of a set of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health and nutrition (RMNCHN) indicators varied at block-level during the statewide scale-up phase of the

methodsWe used data on 22 selected indicators from four rounds of the Community-based Household Survey carried out between 2014 and 2017. Indicator levels at each round were estimated for each block. We used hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling to smooth the raw estimates for each block with the estimates from its neighbouring blocks, and to examine space-time interaction models for evidence of variations in trends of indicators across blocks. We expressed the uncertainty around the smoothed levels and the trends with 95% credible intervals.

resultsThere was evidence of variations in trends at block level in all but three indicators: facility delivery, public facility delivery, and age-appropriate initiation of complementary feeding. Fifteen indicators showed trends in opposite directions (increases in some blocks and declines in others). All blocks had at least 97.5% probability of a rise in immediate breastfeeding, early pregnancy registration, and having at least four antenatal care visits. All blocks had at least 97.5% probability of a decline in seeking care for pregnancy complications.

conclusionsThe findings underscore the value of monitoring and evaluation at local level for targeted implementation of RMNCHN interventions. There is a need for identifying systematic factors leading to universal trends, or variable contextual or implementation factors leading to variable trends, in order to optimise primary health care program impact. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02726230.

Indexed as

Child HealthInfant HealthMaternal HealthBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornLot Quality Assurance SamplingNutritional StatusPregnancyReproductive HealthSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33425328
PMCPMC7758914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.