Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425227›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Rafael-Pinto de Mendonça, Joberth-Rainner Baliza, Adrieli Burey, Larissa-Maria-Assad Cavalcante, Alessandro-Dourado Loguercio, Fernanda-Signorelli Calazans, Marcos-de Oliveira Barceleiro

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07597044 (Evaluation of Sensitivity and Color Change of Different Protocols of In-office Dental Bleaching), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07597044 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Sensitivity and Color Change of Different Protocols of In-office Dental Bleaching

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal FluminenseRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsTooth SensitivityArmsStandard in-office tooth bleaching, Alternative in-office tooth bleaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafael-Pinto de MendonçaFluminense Federal University (UFF), Nova Friburgo Health Institute, Operative Dentistry Department, Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil.
Joberth-Rainner BalizaFluminense Federal University (UFF), Nova Friburgo Health Institute, Operative Dentistry Department, Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil.
Adrieli BureyPonta Grossa State University (UEPG), Ponta Grossa School of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Department, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
Larissa-Maria-Assad CavalcanteFluminense Federal University (UFF), School of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Department, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Alessandro-Dourado LoguercioPonta Grossa State University (UEPG), Ponta Grossa School of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Department, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
Fernanda-Signorelli CalazansPonta Grossa State University (UEPG), Ponta Grossa School of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Department, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
Marcos-de Oliveira BarceleiroFluminense Federal University (UFF), Nova Friburgo Health Institute, Operative Dentistry Department, Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that acidic bleaching gels could lead to worse collateral effects during an in-office bleaching procedure, while neutral or basic products leads towards a better experience. Considering this fact, the main purpose of this study was to evaluate the pH behavior of 6 in-office bleaching gels, compared to the information provided by their manufacturers. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty enamel discs of bovine teeth were prepared, the initial colors of which were measured by a spectrophotometer and then divided into 6 groups. A pH meter was used to measure the pH every 30 seconds until the end of each procedure, when a new color evaluation was then made. The Tukey test was used for statistical analysis of the results.

resultsThere was no difference in the color variation (ΔE) between the groups (

conclusionsIn 3 of the evaluated gels, a discrepancy existed between the manufacturer's information and the data obtained, which could lead, considering previous studies discussed throughout this article, to unexpected collateral effects on the patients, especially dental sensitivity. Thus, clinicians and researchers should be aware about pH stability studies of in-office bleaching gels for better predictability and safety on their clinical usage.

Identifiers

PMID33425227
PMCPMC7781220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.