ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2020
[Primary lung cancer and occupational exposure in a North African population].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer in Algeria: a single-center retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Proportion of thyroid cancer and other cancers in the democratic republic of Congo.World journal of experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Dual inhibition of EGFR‑VEGF: An effective approach to the treatment of advanced non‑small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation (Review).International journal of oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchopulmonary tumors (BPTs) are the most common cancers. They are associated with poor prognosis. They are usually caused by occupational exposure, but this is often underestimated. The purpose of this study is to assess the rate of bronchopulmonary tumors (BPT) probably due to occupational exposure and to investigate the relationship between the type of exposition and the histological type of BPT. We conducted a retrospective epidemiological study, in the Department of Pneumology at the Public Hospital Institution (EPH) in Rouïba. Between January 2014 and June 2019, we collected 357 cases with histologically confirmed BPT. Medical and professional history collections were carried out. The job-exposure matrix was used to identify the various exposures. The study population consisted of 357 patients, with an average age of 63.9±11.1 years and a male to female sex-ratio of 7.4; 76.5% of patients were smokers or former smokers, on average 42 P/A. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma was confirmed histologically in 88.8% of patients. All occupational categories studied would be responsible for 50.7% of exposure-related primary lung cancers, of which 26.5% were due to occupational exposure of heavy-duty drivers and gear drivers. Occupational exposure as a leading cause of bronchopulmonary cancers (CBP) is not negligible but often unrecognized due to its multifactorial factors and the latency period from the time of exposure to onset of disease symptoms, with an impact on the histological type of bronchopulmonary cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.