ArticleCognitive computation2021
Pneumonia Classification Using Deep Learning from Chest X-ray Images During COVID-19.
Article in Cognitive computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 387 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based COVID-19 modeling on multimodal genetic information.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in lumbar radiography: bridging deep learning and clinical practice in low-resource environments.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Review
- Prediction of severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia using multimodal fusion of chest radiographs and clinical data.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Viral pneumonia detection during the COVID-19 pandemic using deep learning and DCGAN-based data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Classification of pulmonary disorders using pulmonary network with explainable AI framework from chest multi-modal images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A lightweight transformer-based hybrid encoder-decoder model for chest X-ray medical report generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pneumonia detection from enhanced chest X-Ray images based on Double SGAN model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A new era in identification of tick genera; artificial intelligence for precision and speed.PeerJ. Computer science · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhancing Medical Image Segmentation and Classification Using a Fuzzy-Driven Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- PneumoNet: Deep Neural Network for Advanced Pneumonia Detection.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- A Flexible Multi-Channel Deep Network Leveraging Texture and Spatial Features for Diagnosing New COVID-19 Variants in Lung CT Scans.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- WSDC-ViT: a novel transformer network for pneumonia image classification based on windows scalable attention and dynamic rectified linear unit convolutional modules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A comparative analysis of the binary and multiclass classified chest X-ray images of pneumonia and COVID-19 with ML and DL models.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- SqueezeViX-Net with SOAE: A Prevailing Deep Learning Framework for Accurate Pneumonia Classification using X-Ray and CT Imaging Modalities.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- FedPneu: Federated Learning for Pneumonia Detection across Multiclient Cross-Silo Healthcare Datasets.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: A novel spectral transformation technique based on special functions for improved chest X-ray image classification.PloS one · 2025Article
- PneuNet: a lightweight convolutional neural network with multiscale feature fusion for automated pneumonia detection from chest X-rays.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Critical Review of the Prospect of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Review
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outbreak of the novel corona virus disease (COVID-19) in December 2019 has led to global crisis around the world. The disease was declared pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) on 11th of March 2020. Currently, the outbreak has affected more than 200 countries with more than 37 million confirmed cases and more than 1 million death tolls as of 10 October 2020. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard method for detection of COVID-19 disease, but it has many challenges such as false positives, low sensitivity, expensive, and requires experts to conduct the test. As the number of cases continue to grow, there is a high need for developing a rapid screening method that is accurate, fast, and cheap. Chest X-ray (CXR) scan images can be considered as an alternative or a confirmatory approach as they are fast to obtain and easily accessible. Though the literature reports a number of approaches to classify CXR images and detect the COVID-19 infections, the majority of these approaches can only recognize two classes (e.g., COVID-19 vs. normal). However, there is a need for well-developed models that can classify a wider range of CXR images belonging to the COVID-19 class itself such as the bacterial pneumonia, the non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia, and the normal CXR scans. The current work proposes the use of a deep learning approach based on pretrained AlexNet model for the classification of COVID-19, non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, and normal CXR scans obtained from different public databases. The model was trained to perform two-way classification (i.e., COVID-19 vs. normal, bacterial pneumonia vs. normal, non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia vs. normal, and COVID-19 vs. bacterial pneumonia), three-way classification (i.e., COVID-19 vs. bacterial pneumonia vs. normal), and four-way classification (i.e., COVID-19 vs. bacterial pneumonia vs. non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia vs. normal). For non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia and normal (healthy) CXR images, the proposed model achieved 94.43% accuracy, 98.19% sensitivity, and 95.78% specificity. For bacterial pneumonia and normal CXR images, the model achieved 91.43% accuracy, 91.94% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. For COVID-19 pneumonia and normal CXR images, the model achieved 99.16% accuracy, 97.44% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. For classification CXR images of COVID-19 pneumonia and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia, the model achieved 99.62% accuracy, 90.63% sensitivity, and 99.89% specificity. For the three-way classification, the model achieved 94.00% accuracy, 91.30% sensitivity, and 84.78%. Finally, for the four-way classification, the model achieved an accuracy of 93.42%, sensitivity of 89.18%, and specificity of 98.92%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.