Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33425010›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2020

Platelet-to-lymphocyte percentage ratio index: a simple non-invasive index to monitor the endoscopic activity in Crohn's disease.

Rirong Chen, Li Li, Kang Chao, Mengzhi Hong, Qian Cao, Lingna Ye, Gaoshi Zhou, Xiaoli Fang, Huili Guo, Xiaocang Cao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio at Diagnosis of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Multi-Center Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rirong ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Li LiDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou 510080, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-901X
Kang ChaoDivision of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Mengzhi HongMedical laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Qian CaoDivision of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lingna YeDivision of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Gaoshi ZhouDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Xiaoli FangDivision of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Huili GuoDivision of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Xiaocang CaoDivision of Gastroenterology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoqi YeDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Zhirong ZengDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Minhu ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou 510080, P.R. China.
Shenghong ZhangDivision of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou 510080, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-8781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence has shown that the complete blood count (CBC) is abnormal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to investigate an effective CBC parameter and explore its impact on disease activity in a large CD cohort.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with established CD who underwent clinically indicated endoscopy at four tertiary centres in China between 2016 and 2020. Individual variables of the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD, CBC parameters, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and faecal calprotectin (FC) were independently reviewed by different investigators. The hold-out method was used to verify the predictive power of the established model.

resultsData from a total of 1388 endoscopic procedures performed for 882 eligible CD patients were available with routine blood parameters and related indicators. The model using platelet-to-lymphocyte percentage ratio (PLpR) had high accuracy for identifying patients in endoscopic remission (ER), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.785 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.784-0.787], which was comparable with that for CRP (AUC: 0.775, 95% CI: 0.774-0.777). Notably, the AUC of PLpR was significantly higher than that of CRP in patients with colonic disease and with a history of surgery. Moreover, after combining the FC with PLpR, the AUC value of FC + PLpR increased up to 0.892 (95% CI: 0.890-0.894) for identifying ER.

conclusionsWe explored an index (PLpR) to identify CD patients in ER based on platelet and lymphocyte percentage from the CBC. PLpR helped evaluate the degree of disease activity and monitor the therapeutic response.

Indexed as

complete blood countCrohn’s diseaseendoscopic disease activityendoscopic remissionplatelet-to-lymphocyte percentage ratio

Identifiers

PMID33425010
PMCPMC7758565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.