Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33424987›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Comparison between Tonifying Kidney Yang and Yin in Treating Segmental Bone Defects Based on the Induced Membrane Technique: An Experimental Study in a Rat Model.

Zhen Shen, Zehua Chen, Xiaodong Shi, Tao Wang, Minling Huang, Guoqian Chen, Xiangling Ye, Chengzhi Hou, Wengang Liu, Wei Dong and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms of the Masquelet technique to promote bone defect repair and its influencing factors.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The induced membrane technique in animal models: a systematic review.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhen ShenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6109-9775
Zehua ChenThe Fifth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-679X
Xiaodong ShiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650011, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650011, China.
Minling HuangThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Guoqian ChenThe Fifth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Xiangling YeThe Fifth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Chengzhi HouAcademy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Wengang LiuThe Fifth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Wei DongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-683X
Ying GuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-7691
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNYunnan University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNKunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tonifying kidney therapy consisting of tonifying kidney yang and yin is the basic principle of Chinese medicine in treating segmental bone defects (SBDs). Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of the differences between tonifying kidney yang and yin in bone metabolism of osteoporosis and distraction osteogenesis models. However, whether the difference between the two tonifying kidney methods in bone repair for the induced membrane (IM) technique occurs or what is the difference remain unclear. Angiogeneic-osteogenic coupling plays an important role in bone repair and the induced membrane couples angiogenesis with the later osteogenesis during the IM process. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tonifying kidney yang (total flavonoids of Rhizoma Drynariae, TFRD) and yin (plastrum testudinis extract, PTE) on angiogenesis and osteogenesis in the IM-treated SBDs. Rats of 6 mm tibia bone defect model treated with IM were divided into five groups: the control group, the model group, the tonifying kidney yang group (TFRD-treated group), the tonifying kidney yin group (PTE-treated group), and the western medicine group. At 4 weeks after insertion of the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), three caudal vertebrae from the tail in each rat were implanted into the 6 mm defect gap. Radiographical, histological, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescent analyses were performed to assess bone and vessel formation at 4 or 12 weeks after insertion of the PMMA, respectively. Our results revealed that TFRD and PTE were beneficial to both angiogenesis and osteogenesis. TFRD exerted a better effect on angiogenesis than PTE and achieved a better result in stage 1 rather than in stage 2 of IM, whereas PTE was superior to TFRD in osteogenesis and achieved a better result in stage 2 instead of stage 1. Collectively, these findings elucidated the beneficial effects of tonifying kidney yang and yin on angiogenesis and osteogenesis of SBD repair during the IM process, as well as the difference that tonifying kidney yang surpasses tonifying kidney yin in angiogenesis while tonifying kidney yin outperforms tonifying kidney yang in osteogenesis, which suggests that the combination between the application of tonifying kidney yang method in stage 1 of IM and tonifying kidney yin method in stage 2 may achieve better repair efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID33424987
PMCPMC7781691
OpenAlexW3117678693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.