Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33424934›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2020

Prospects for the Analysis and Reduction of Damaging Behaviour in Group-Housed Livestock, With Application to Pig Breeding.

Laurianne Canario, Piter Bijma, Ingrid David, Irene Camerlink, Alexandre Martin, Wendy Mercedes Rauw, Loïc Flatres-Grall, Lisette van der Zande, Simon P Turner, Catherine Larzul and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How to Improve Meat Quality and Welfare in Entire Male Pigs by Genetics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Laurianne CanarioGenPhySE, INRAE French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ingrid DavidGenPhySE, INRAE French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Irene CamerlinkInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Alexandre MartinGenPhySE, INRAE French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Wendy Mercedes RauwDepartment of Animal Breeding, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Madrid, Spain.
Loïc Flatres-GrallAXIOM, La Garenne-Colombes, France.
Lisette van der ZandeAdaptation Physiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Simon P TurnerScotland's Rural College, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Catherine LarzulGenPhySE, INRAE French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Lotta RydhmerDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRGénétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage · FRInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences · PLInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESKing's College Hospital · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SETopigs Norsvin (Netherlands) · NLUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovations in the breeding and management of pigs are needed to improve the performance and welfare of animals raised in social groups, and in particular to minimise biting and damage to group mates. Depending on the context, social interactions between pigs can be frequent or infrequent, aggressive, or non-aggressive. Injuries or emotional distress may follow. The behaviours leading to damage to conspecifics include progeny savaging, tail, ear or vulva biting, and excessive aggression. In combination with changes in husbandry practices designed to improve living conditions, refined methods of genetic selection may be a solution reducing these behaviours. Knowledge gaps relating to lack of data and limits in statistical analyses have been identified. The originality of this paper lies in its proposal of several statistical methods for common use in analysing and predicting unwanted behaviours, and for genetic use in the breeding context. We focus on models of interaction reflecting the identity and behaviour of group mates which can be applied directly to damaging traits, social network analysis to define new and more integrative traits, and capture-recapture analysis to replace missing data by estimating the probability of behaviours. We provide the rationale for each method and suggest they should be combined for a more accurate estimation of the variation underlying damaging behaviours.

Indexed as

aggressionbreedinggeneticsmodelsavagingsocial interactionsSus scrofatail biting

Identifiers

PMID33424934
PMCPMC7786278
OpenAlexW3115490197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.