ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020
NGS-Based
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The CDC/APHL next generation sequencing quality initiative: practical guidance to implementing quality management systems in laboratories performing next generation sequencing (phase 2).Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Target Discovery in ESKAPE Pathogens: An AI-Driven Framework from Omics-Based to Systems-Level Modeling and Clinical Translation.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deciphering the genetic context of the emerging OXA-484-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli from ST167 high-risk clone in the United Arab Emirates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- Impact of wet-lab protocols on quality of whole-genome short-read sequences from foodborne microbial pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Methicillin-resistantEmerging microbes & infections · 2022Article
- Combination of Whole Genome Sequencing and Metagenomics for Microbiological Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Notable Achievements and the Prospects of Bacterial Pathogen Genomics.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Exploiting genomics to mitigate the public health impact of antimicrobial resistance.Genome medicine · 2022Review
- External Quality Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Sequencing: an ESGMD-SSM Pilot Trial across 15 European Laboratories.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Transition From PCR-Ribotyping to Whole Genome Sequencing Based Typing ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) enables high resolution typing of bacteria up to the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) level. WGS is used in clinical microbiology laboratories for infection control, molecular surveillance and outbreak analyses. Given the large palette of WGS reagents and bioinformatics tools, the Swiss clinical bacteriology community decided to conduct a ring trial (RT) to foster harmonization of NGS-based bacterial typing. The RT aimed at assessing methicillin-susceptible
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.