ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Contextual Cueing Effect Under Rapid Presentation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sense of agency modulates contextual learning in visual search.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Contextual cueing and attention control: Self-face vs. stranger-face search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Statistical Context Learning in Visual Search: Distinct Electrophysiological Signatures of Contextual Guidance and Context Suppression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Template-based attentional guidance and generic procedural learning in contextual guided visual search: Evidence from reduced response time variability.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Modeling the dynamics of contextual cueing effect by reinforcement learning.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- No evidence for contextual cueing beyond explicit recognition.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Effect of cue validity on the contextual cueing effect.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The effect of task-irrelevant objects in spatial contextual cueing.Frontiers in cognition · 2024Article
- Statistical learning guides visual attention within iconic memory.Memory & cognition · 2023Article
- Task-Irrelevant Context Learned Under Rapid Display Presentation: Selective Attention in Associative Blocking.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In contextual cueing, previously encountered context tends to facilitate the detection of the target embedded in it than when the target appears in a novel context. In this study, we investigated whether the contextual cueing could develop at early time when the search display was presented briefly. In four experiments, participants searched for a target T in an array of distractor Ls. The results showed that with a rather short presentation time of the search display, participants were able to learn the spatial context and speeded up their response time overall, with the learning effect lasting for a long period. Specifically, the contextual cueing effect was observed either with or without a mask after a duration of 300-ms presentation of the search display. Such a context learning under rapid presentation could not operate only with the local context information repeated, thus suggesting that a global context was required to guide spatial attention when the viewing time of the search display was limited. Overall, these findings indicate that contextual cueing might arise at an "early," target selection stage and that the global context is necessary for the context learning under rapid presentation to function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.