ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Decision Regret Scale.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06799936 (A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the Content and Effect of Web-Based Decision Aids for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Associations of Patient and Parent Characteristics With Parental Decision Regret in the PICU: A Secondary Analysis of the 2015-2017 Navigate Randomized Comparative Trial.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2024Trial
- Predicting 6-month decisional regret among family surrogate decision-makers of ICU patients: development and internal validation of prediction models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Validating the Korean versions of the flourish index and the secure flourish index: a comprehensive psychometric approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Factors influencing shared decision-making and decision regret in parents of children undergoing myopia control within one year.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Enhancing the effects of nusinersen with cybernic treatment using Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) in spinal muscular atrophy: a real-world case series and exploratory cohort analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Observational
- Psychosocial barriers and cultural contexts in chemotherapy decision-making: a qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Validation and dyadic invariance of the Infertility Concerns Questionnaire among Brazilian couples.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Psychometric properties and network analysis of the Chinese version of the uncertainty about disease and treatment scale for patients undergoing hemodialysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Decision regret related to urinary diversion choices after cystectomy among Chinese bladder cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Measuring health-related quality of life and well-being: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the EQ-5D-5L, ReQoL-UI and ICECAP-A.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- The use of theFrontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Satisfaction With Patient Engagement and Self-Reported Depression Among Hospitalized Patients: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- The Relationship Between Decisional Regret and Well-Being in Patients With and Without Depressive Disorders: Mediating Role of Shared Decision-Making.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- A web-based, user-centered decision aid to support parental choices in myopia control: A development and usability study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the decision regret scale (DRSc).
methodsThe data of 704 patients who completed the DRSc were used for the analyses. We evaluated the construct, convergent/discriminant, and known-group validity; internal consistency and test-retest reliability; and the item invariance of the DRSc. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to confirm the optimal cutoff point of the scale.
resultsA confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that a one-factor model fits the data. The internal consistency (α = 0.74) and test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.71] of the DRSc were acceptable. The DRSc demonstrated unidimensionality and invariance for use across the sexes. It was confirmed that an optimal cutoff point of 25 could discriminate between patients with high and low decisional regret during clinical practice.
conclusionThe DRSc is a parsimonious instrument that can be used to measure the uncertainty inherent in medical decisions. It can be employed to provide knowledge, offer support, and elicit patient preferences in an attempt to promote shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.