SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2020
A Systematic Review of Normative Studies Using Images of Common Objects.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emojis vs. black-and-white and colored drawings: comparing living and non-living things in oral naming.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- Article
- Neural correlates of semantic typicality during episodic memory retrieval in autism spectrum disorder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- HMI efficiency, usability and workload during take-over in AVs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Beyond Reality Image Collection (BRIC).Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- ORCA: A picture database of object-scene arrangements for cross-cultural and aging research.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Nudge and bias in subjective ratings? The role of icon sets in determining ratings of icon characteristics.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Polish norms for a set of colored drawings of 168 objects and 146 actions with predictors of naming performance.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Informing Streetscape Design with Citizen Perceptions of Safety and Place: An Immersive Virtual Environment E-Participation Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Aesthetic appeal influences visual search performance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Conceptual knowledge modulates memory recognition of common items: The selective role of item-typicality.Memory & cognition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Common objects comprise living and non-living things people interact with in their daily-lives. Images depicting common objects are extensively used in different fields of research and intervention, such as linguistics, psychology, and education. Nevertheless, their adequate use requires the consideration of several factors (e.g., item-differences, cultural-context and confounding correlated variables), and careful validation procedures. The current study presents a systematic review of the available published norms for images of common objects. A systematic search using PRISMA guidelines indicated that despite their extensive use, the production of norms for such stimuli with adult populations is quite limited (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.