Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33424525›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental chemistry letters2021

Silkworm and spider silk electrospinning: a review.

Clémence Belbéoch, Joseph Lejeune, Philippe Vroman, Fabien Salaün

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental chemistry letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Existing and Novel Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clémence BelbéochENSAIT: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Arts et Industries Textiles, Roubaix, France.
Joseph LejeuneENSAIT: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Arts et Industries Textiles, Roubaix, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-3403
Philippe VromanENSAIT: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Arts et Industries Textiles, Roubaix, France.
Fabien SalaünENSAIT: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Arts et Industries Textiles, Roubaix, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Issues of fossil fuel and plastic pollution are shifting public demand toward biopolymer-based textiles. For instance, silk, which has been traditionally used during at least 5 milleniums in China, is re-emerging in research and industry with the development of high-tech spinning methods. Various arthropods, e.g. insects and arachnids, produce silky proteinic fiber of unique properties such as resistance, elasticity, stickiness and toughness, that show huge potential for biomaterial applications. Compared to synthetic analogs, silk presents advantages of low density, degradability and versatility. Electrospinning allows the creation of nonwoven mats whose pore size and structure show unprecedented characteristics at the nanometric scale, versus classical weaving methods or modern techniques such as melt blowing. Electrospinning has recently allowed to produce silk scaffolds, with applications in regenerative medicine, drug delivery, depollution and filtration. Here we review silk production by the spinning apparatus of the silkworm

Indexed as

Aranea diadematusBiomimeticBio polymerBombyx moriBombyx mori’s silkDegradabilityElectrospinningElectrospinning matLife cycleMechanical propertiesNephila clavipesPolymerRegenerated silkSilkSpider’s silkSpider webSupercontractionSustainabilityTensile test

Identifiers

PMID33424525
PMCPMC7779161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.