ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021
Comparative phenotypic characterization identifies few differences in the metabolic capacity between
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Characterization and Probiotic Properties of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus Isolated from Fermented Rice.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Short- and Long-Read Sequencing Reveals the Presence and Evolution of an IncF Plasmid HarboringMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Possible step-up in prevalence for Escherichia coli ST131 from fecal to clinical isolates: inferred virulence potential comparative studies within phylogenetic group B2.Journal of biomedical science · 2022Article
- Comparative Metabolic Characterization of Extraintestinal PathogenicJournal of tropical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtraintestinal pathogenic
methodsThe metabolic activity of forty urine
resultsThe data of this study found almost similar metabolic profiles between ST131 and non-ST131, suggesting that ST131 is not a metabolically unique clone of ExPEC. There was also no link between antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and high metabolic capacity of ST131 isolates. Testing the biochemical activity of isolates belonging to ST131 subclones found higher activity of
conclusionThis study demonstrated no difference in the metabolism of ST131 and non-ST131, although it uncovered the presence of few significant differences in the metabolic capacity between ST131 subclones. Carrying out whole-genome based studies on ST131 and its main subclones is essential to elucidate the genetic factors responsible for the success of particular ST131 subclones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.