ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021
A survey of therapeutic drug monitoring in a teaching hospital.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Testing as Guides to Psychotropic Drug Dose Adjustment: An Observational Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Pharmacist-Managed Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Programs within Australian Hospital and Health Services-A National Survey of Current Practice.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is one of the tools that aim to improve and ensure the best therapeutic effects while avoiding drug toxicity. This study aimed to identify the clinical utilization and application of TDM at a major teaching hospital in Jeddah.
methodsA cross sectional survey of the clinical utilization and application of TDM at King Abdulaziz University Teaching Hospital across nurses in medical, surgical, pediatric, and intensive care units. The sample size (n = 130) represented 30% of the nursing population. The collection of questionnaires started on the 31st of January 2019 and was completed by the 10th of March 2019.
resultsThe indication to use TDM was well-known to respondents. However, only 64% of respondents reported collection and measuring of the correct drug levels at a precise sampling time with no specific protocols being followed for each drug. Moreover, only 53% reported that the drug levels were being re-measured and adequately monitored for the right indication and proper sampling time. Regarding the presence of clinical pharmacists, 70% of the respondents indicated that no clinical pharmacist worked in their department.
conclusionResults demonstrate that appropriate sampling time was not used for the majority of monitored drugs. In the absence of a TDM request form, this finding probably indicates the lack of national or local TDM guidelines. In conclusion, TDM services, which include standardized forms, references, and an active clinical pharmacist will likely improve the application of TDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.