Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33424264›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2020

Developing a framework regarding a complex risk based methodology in the evaluation of hazards associated with medicinal products sourced via the internet.

Róbert György Vida, Sára Merczel, Eszter Jáhn, András Fittler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quality of dorzolamide hydrochloride and timolol maleate containing eye drops distributed online.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Róbert György VidaUniversity of Pécs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics and Central Clinical Pharmacy, Honvéd Street 3, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Sára MerczelDepartment of Pharmacy, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Tallián Gyula Street 20-32, 7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.
Eszter JáhnUniversity of Pécs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics and Central Clinical Pharmacy, Honvéd Street 3, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
András FittlerUniversity of Pécs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics and Central Clinical Pharmacy, Honvéd Street 3, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, the increasing number of illicit internet pharmacies is a global phenomenon, however, the size of the online pharmaceutical market is still relatively unknown and the dubious quality of products is questionable and warrants investigation. Descriptive data from this black market channel are derived from studies analyzing the online availability of different medications procured over the internet and their methodology is quite heterogeneous. Our aim was to develop a comprehensive and specific risk assessment for selecting high patient safety risk medications from the online pharmaceutical market. A rapid tool was developed based upon the two quality and safety standard resolutions in pharmaceutical practice, published by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines, and was illustrated on eye drops. We developed five dimensions in support of the risk assessment including intrinsic, extrinsic and potential risks of counterfeiting. The five criteria were integrated in a comprehensively weighted risk-scoring format. The probability of procuring the product from the internet was also assessed based on the number of relevant links within the first twenty search engine results and the cost of the products. With the application of the tool a dorzolamide & timolol combination eye drop represented the highest overall patient safety risk score. In consideration of our literature review of the past 20 years, there is no current, standardized methodology to effectively identify pharmaceutical products associated with high patient safety risks. Notably, the fully comprehensive analysis of the internet pharmaceutical market and the test purchase of all online available medicines is unrealistic. Therefore, we developed a method to aid online surveillance researches and targeted international organizational led joint actions against the uncontrolled sale of falsified and substandard medications (e.g.: Operation Pangea).

Indexed as

Counterfeit medicineEye dropsInternet pharmacyOnline medicinesRisk assessmentTest purchase

Identifiers

PMID33424264
PMCPMC7783221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.