Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33424187›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Experimental and clinical analysis of the use of asymmetric vs symmetric polyethylene inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Gianluca Castellarin, Edoardo Bori, Bernardo Innocenti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gianluca CastellarinII Unit Orthopaedic Department, Ospedale di Suzzara, Mantova, Italy.
Edoardo BoriBEAMS Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Bernardo InnocentiBEAMS Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared the effects of symmetric and asymmetric designs for mobile bearing polyethylene insert for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), both clinically and biomechanically through experimental cadaver tests.

methods303 patients implanted with a mobile bearing TKA were retrospectively analyzed up to 2-year follow-up with relative scores. The same femoral and tibial components were used for all the patients; 151 patients received a Symmetric Design (SD) insert and 152 an Asymmetric Design (AD). A biomechanical experimental test was performed to improve the comprehension of the clinical results, analyzing passive squat on 5 cadaveric knee specimens: internal-external rotations of femur and tibial insert respect to the tibia tray were analyzed in native and implanted configurations (with both symmetrical and asymmetrical inserts for each specimen).

resultsAfter surgery, patients' average flexion improved from 105° (with preoperative extension deficit of 5°), to 115° (SD-group) and 120° (AD-group) at the 2-year follow-up. There was no postoperative extension deficit. AD-group presented better ability to perform certain routines and wasn't affected by any pain, while antero-lateral pain was reported in some SD-group patients. The experimental tests returned no statistically relevant difference in tibio-femoral flexion-extension and internal-external rotations among all the three configurations tested; a statistically significant difference is found for insert-tray internal-external rotations between SD and AD configurations; in details, the AD insert showed insert-tray angles comparable to the ones found for femoral component-tibial tray, while the SD insert returned lower angular values.

conclusionClinically and biomechanically, an asymmetric mobile bearing insert could represent a valid alternative to symmetric mobile bearing insert. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Case-control study Retrospective comparative study.

Indexed as

Asymmetric insertBiomechanicsInsert congruencyKinematicsMobile bearingSymmetric insertTKA

Identifiers

PMID33424187
PMCPMC7779829
OpenAlexW3113415319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.