Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33424120›Full record

ArticleNatural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2021

Livelihood resilience and strategies of rural residents of earthquake-threatened areas in Sichuan Province, China.

Wenfeng Zhou, Shili Guo, Xin Deng, Dingde Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measuring Community Resilience and Its Determinants: Relocated Vulnerable Community in Western China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatio-Temporal Variation and Decomposition Analysis of Livelihood Resilience of Rural Residents in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Livelihood Capital Effects on Famers' Strategy Choices in Flood-Prone Areas-A Study in Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stay in Risk Area: Place Attachment, Efficacy Beliefs and Risk Coping.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of Environmental and Health Risks on Rural Households' Sustainable Livelihoods: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenfeng ZhouCollege of Management of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130 China.
Shili GuoChina Western Economic Research Center, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 610074 China.
Xin DengCollege of Economics of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130 China.
Dingde XuCollege of Management of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130 China.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-6540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural disasters are increasing in frequency in China. Enhancing residents' livelihood resilience and adjusting their livelihood strategies have gradually become effective means of dealing with disaster risk. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the livelihood strategies and livelihood resilience of rural residents in earthquake-stricken areas to help them cope with disaster risks. However, few studies have explored the correlation between residents' livelihood resilience and livelihood strategies from the perspective of residents' livelihood resilience. Based on a survey of 327 households in four districts and counties of Sichuan Province, China that were affected by the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes, we construct a framework for analyzing livelihood resilience and livelihood strategy selection. We comprehensively analyze the characteristics of livelihood resilience and livelihood strategy and explore their correlation using an ordinal multi-classification logistic regression model. The results show that: (1) Among 327 sample households, 90.21% were non-farming, 3.67% were part-time households and 6.12% were farming households. Residents' livelihood resilience is mainly based on their disaster prevention and mitigation capacity. (2) As far as the correlation between livelihood resilience and livelihood strategies is concerned, the stronger the buffer capacity in livelihood resilience, the more rural residents tend to engage in non-farming activities to obtain income. When other conditions remain unchanged, the logarithmic probability of choosing an agricultural livelihood strategy decreases by 21.814 for each unit of buffer capacity. From the perspective of residents' livelihood resilience, this study deepens our understanding of the relationship between livelihood resilience and livelihood strategy in earthquake-stricken areas. It also provides useful information for the formulation of policies to improve residents' resilience in disaster-threatened areas.

Indexed as

ChinaDisaster prevention and mitigationEarthquake-stricken areasLivelihood resilienceLivelihood strategy

Identifiers

PMID33424120
PMCPMC7776305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.