ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2021
Accurate computation: COVID-19 rRT-PCR positive test dataset using stages classification through textual big data mining with machine learning.
Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proof of concept of the potential of a machine learning algorithm to extract new information from conventional SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR results.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Systematic Literature Review and Future Perspectives for Handling Big Data Analytics in COVID-19 Diagnosis.New generation computing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-11-21Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Compromised Peer Review · Rogue Editor · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In every field of life, advanced technology has become a rapid outcome, particularly in the medical field. The recent epidemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has promptly become outbreaks to identify early action from suspected cases at the primary stage over the risk prediction. It is overbearing to progress a control system that will locate the coronavirus. At present, the confirmation of COVID-19 infection by the ideal standard test of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) by the extension of RNA viral, although it presents identified from deficiencies of long reversal time to generate results in 2-4 h of corona with a necessity of certified laboratories. In this proposed system, a machine learning (ML) algorithm is used to classify the textual clinical report into four classes by using the textual data mining method. The algorithm of the ensemble ML classifier has performed feature extraction using the advanced techniques of term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF/IDF) which is an effective information retrieval technique from the corona dataset. Humans get infected by coronaviruses in three ways: first, mild respiratory disease which is globally pandemic, and human coronaviruses are caused by HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-229E; second, the zoonotic Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV); and finally, higher case casualty rate defined as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). By using the machine learning techniques, the three-way COVID-19 stages are classified by the extraction of the feature using the data retrieval process. The TF/IDF is used to measure and evaluate statistically the text data mining of COVID-19 patient's record list for classification and prediction of the coronavirus. This study established the feasibility of techniques to analyze blood tests and machine learning as an alternative to rRT-PCR for detecting the category of COVID-19-positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.