Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423739›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

A survey of early-career researchers in Australia.

Katherine Christian, Carolyn Johnstone, Jo-Ann Larkins, Wendy Wright, Michael R Doran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Editorial: Research integrity.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine ChristianSchool of Arts, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9690-1417
Carolyn JohnstoneSchool of Arts, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia.
Jo-Ann LarkinsSchool of Engineering, Information Technology and Physical Sciences, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Australia.
Wendy WrightSchool of Science, Psychology and Sport, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-1273
Michael R DoranSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Centre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5876-4757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-career researchers (ECRs) make up a large portion of the academic workforce and their experiences often reflect the wider culture of the research system. Here we surveyed 658 ECRs working in Australia to better understand the needs and challenges faced by this community. Although most respondents indicated a 'love of science', many also expressed an intention to leave their research position. The responses highlight how job insecurity, workplace culture, mentorship and 'questionable research practices' are impacting the job satisfaction of ECRs and potentially compromising science in Australia. We also make recommendations for addressing some of these concerns.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceJob SatisfactionAustraliaHumansResearch PersonnelWorkforcecareer developmentECRjob securitynonepostdocsresearch culturescientific integrity

Identifiers

PMID33423739
PMCPMC7800379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.