Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423706›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

An exploration of key barriers to healthcare providers' use of food prescription (FRx) interventions in the rural South.

Kara Beth Coward, Anne Cafer, Meagen Rosenthal, David Allen, Queenie Paltanwale

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kara Beth CowardDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, The University of Mississippi, 543 Lamar Hall, PO Box 1848, Oxford, MS38677-1848, USA.
Anne CaferDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, The University of Mississippi, 543 Lamar Hall, PO Box 1848, Oxford, MS38677-1848, USA.
Meagen RosenthalCommunity First Research Center for Wellbeing and Creative Achievement (CREW), The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
David AllenDepartment of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Queenie PaltanwaleDepartment of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
University of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the attitude towards food prescriptions (FRx) interventions among clinicians and identify potential barriers to their use in clinical practice.

designThe current study employed an exploratory research design using in-depth semi-structured interviews. Research participants were selected from primary care facilities, family practice offices and obesity clinics located in Mississippi and Louisiana.

settingProviders selected for participation in the current study serve predominantly rural, low-income communities in the US South.

participantsFrom an original population of fifty healthcare providers that included physicians, registered dieticians and nurse practitioners, from Oxford, Tupelo, Batesville, Jackson, and Charleston, MS and New Orleans, LA. Fifteen healthcare providers agreed to participate, including three physicians, four registered dieticians, three nurses and three nurse practitioners.

resultsThe current study found that while healthcare providers expressed a desire to use FRx interventions, there was a universal lack of understanding by healthcare providers of what FRx interventions were, how they were implemented and what outcomes they were likely to influence.

conclusionsThe current study identified key bottlenecks in the use of FRx interventions at the clinic level and data provided evidence for two key recommendations: (1) development and validation of a screening tool to be used by clinicians for enrolling patients in such interventions and (2) implementation of nutrition education in primary professional training, as well as in continuing education.

Indexed as

FoodPrescriptionsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth EducationHealth Services AccessibilityHumansQualitative ResearchRural PopulationChronic disease interventionFood prescriptionFood RxSouth

Identifiers

PMID33423706
PMCPMC10195487
OpenAlexW3119041091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.