Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423683›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2021

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Zhen Yuan, Ying Zhang, Dongyan Cao, Keng Shen, Qingshui Li, Guonan Zhang, Xiaohua Wu, Manhua Cui, Ying Yue, Wenjun Cheng and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Predicting Response to Anthracyclines in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Zhen YuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, Zip code: 100730, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, Zip code: 100730, China. zhangyingpumch@163.com.
Dongyan CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, Zip code: 100730, China. caodongyanpumch@sina.com.
Keng ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, Zip code: 100730, China. shenkengpumch@163.com.
Qingshui LiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shandong, China.
Guonan ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan, China.
Xiaohua WuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Manhua CuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Ying YueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Wenjun ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Jiangsu, China.
Li WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, He Nan Cancer Hospital, Henan, China.
Pengpeng QuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin, China.
Guangshi TaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Hunan, China.
Jianqing HouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Shandong, China.
Lixin SunDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Shanxi, China.
Yuanguang MengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guiling LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuhan Union Hospital of China, Hubei, China.
Changzhong LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong, China.
Huirong ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Yaqing ChenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCentral South University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Bethune Hospital of Jilin University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CNShanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNSichuan Cancer Hospital · CNTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics · CNWuhan Union Hospital · CNYuhuangding Hospital · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of PLD in treating of in patients who experience epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal, and peritoneal cancer progression within 12 months after the first-line platinum-based therapy.

methodsThis was an open-label, single-arm and multicenter clinical trial. The ORR was the interim primary objective, and the DCR, AEs and QOL were the secondary objectives. The impact of factors on efficacy outcomes, the change trend of CA125 and the artificial platinum-free interval were exploratory endpoints.

resultsTotally, 115 patients were enrolled in this study and included in the ITT population. Moreover, 101 patients were included in the safety population. The median follow-up time was 4 months (IQR 2-6). In the ITT population, the confirmed ORR was 37.4% (95% CI, 28.4-46.4%), and the DCR was 65.2% (95% CI, 56.4-74.1%). The previous response status to platinum-based chemotherapy and baseline CA125 levels were significantly correlated with the ORR. The ORR was significantly higher in patients with a CA125 decrease after the first cycle than in the patients with a CA125 increase. The most common grade 3 or higher AE was hand-foot syndrome (3 [3.0%] of 101 patients). No statistically significant differences existed between the baseline and the postbaseline questionnaires.

conclusionsFor patients who experience platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory relapse, the use of PLD may be acceptable because of the associated satisfactory efficacy, low frequency of AEs and high patient QOL. Moreover, a low CA125 level at baseline and a reduction in CA125 after the first cycle are predictive factors for satisfactory efficacy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsYoung AdultDoxorubicinliposomal doxorubicinPolyethylene GlycolsCA125Partially platinum-sensitive relapsePegylated liposomal doxorubicinPlatinum-refractory relapsePlatinum-resistant relapse

Identifiers

PMID33423683
PMCPMC7798203
OpenAlexW3119274507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.