Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423671›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Unemployment rate, opioids misuse and other substance abuse: quasi-experimental evidence from treatment admissions data.

Sunday Azagba, Lingpeng Shan, Fares Qeadan, Mark Wolfson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association Between Unemployment and Mental Disorders: A Narrative Update of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunday AzagbaDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. s.azagba@utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5810-2841
Lingpeng ShanDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Fares QeadanDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Mark WolfsonDepartment of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, 92501, USA.
University of Utah · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Assessing the Effects of State Alcohol Exclusion Laws on Alcohol-Related Behaviors and OutcomesR01AA026666 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AZAGBA, SUNDAY · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between economic conditions and substance abuse is unclear, with few studies reporting drug-specific substance abuse. The present study examined the association between economic conditions and drug-specific substance abuse admissions.

methodsState annual administrative data were drawn from the 1993-2016 Treatment Episode Data Set. The outcome variable was state-level aggregate number of treatment admissions for six categories of primary substance abuse (alcohol, marijuana/hashish, opiates, cocaine, stimulants, and other drugs). Additionally, we used a broader outcome for the number of treatment admissions, including primary, secondary, and tertiary diagnoses. We used a quasi-experimental approach -difference-in-difference model- to estimate the association between changes in economic conditions and substance abuse treatment admissions, adjusting for state characteristics. In addition, we performed two additional analyses to investigate (1) whether economic conditions have an asymmetric effect on the number of substance use admissions during economic downturns and upturns, and (2) the moderation effects of economic recessions (2001, 2008-09) on the relationship between economic conditions and substance use treatment.

resultsThe baseline model showed that unemployment rate was significantly associated with substance abuse treatment admissions. A unit increase in state unemployment rate was associated with a 9% increase in treatment admissions for opiates (β = 0.087, p < .001). Similar results were found for other substance abuse treatment admissions (cocaine (β = 0.081, p < .001), alcohol (β = 0.050, p < .001), marijuana (β = 0.036, p < .01), and other drugs (β = 0.095, p < .001). Unemployment rate was negatively associated with treatment admissions for stimulants (β = - 0.081, p < .001). The relationship between unemployment rate and opioids treatment admissions was not statistically significant in models that adjusted for state fixed effects and allowed for a state- unique time trend. We found that the association between state unemployment rates and annual substance abuse admissions has the same direction during economic downturns and upturns. During the economic recession, the negative association between unemployment rate and treatment admissions for stimulants was weakened.

conclusionThese findings suggest that economic hardship may have increased substance abuse. Treatment for substance use of certain drugs and alcohol should remain a priority even during economic downturns.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidSubstance-Related DisordersEconomic RecessionHospitalizationHumansUnemploymentAnalgesics, OpioidEconomic conditions; unemployment rateOpioidsSubstance abuse treatmentTreatment admissions

Identifiers

PMID33423671
PMCPMC7798212
OpenAlexW3119006414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.