ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021
Continuous decisions.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning Decouples Accuracy and Reaction Time for Rapid Decisions in a Transitive Inference Task.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Selective observation following betrayal shapes the social inference landscape.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Review
- A diffusion model analysis of task set inertia and task set reconfiguration in ADHD.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026Article
- Human foraging strategies flexibly adapt to resource distribution and time constraints.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cognitive models facilitate real-time inference of latent motives.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond discrete social decisions: toward continuous dyadic neural dynamics in cooperation and competition.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Continuous dynamics of cooperation and competition in social decision-making.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Computational elements of natural vision.Journal of vision · 2025Review
- Collective decision making by embodied neural agents.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Foraging animals use dynamic Bayesian updating to model meta-uncertainty in environment representations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Adaptive planning depth in human problem-solving.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Affective integration in experience, judgment, and decision-making.Communications psychology · 2024Review
- Subthalamic control of impulsive actions: insights from deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Review
- The neural dynamics associated with computational complexity.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Modelling dataset bias in machine-learned theories of economic decision-making.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Foraging Under Uncertainty Follows the Marginal Value Theorem with Bayesian Updating of Environment Representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Sensorimotor transformation underlying odor-modulated locomotion in walking Drosophila.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Hierarchical action encoding in prefrontal cortex of freely moving macaques.Cell reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and other animals evolved to make decisions that extend over time with continuous and ever-changing options. Nonetheless, the academic study of decision-making is mostly limited to the simple case of choice between two options. Here, we advocate that the study of choice should expand to include
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.