Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423405›Full record

ArticleJournal of menopausal medicine2020

Initial Experience of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Apical Prolapse in South Korea.

Eun Hee Yu, Ha Eun Jung, Hye Kyung Noh, Jong Kil Joo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of menopausal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of 1-year outcomes after uterine-preserving laparoscopic pectopexy using an inverted T-shaped mesh versus the horizontal DynaMesh: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eun Hee YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Medical Research Institute, Busan, Korea.
Ha Eun JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Medical Research Institute, Busan, Korea.
Hye Kyung NohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Medical Research Institute, Busan, Korea.
Jong Kil JooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Medical Research Institute, Busan, Korea. jongkilj@hanmail.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-1512
Pusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Pusan National University Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the herniation or bulging of the pelvic organs to or beyond the vaginal introitus. POP is a common condition affecting more than half of parous women. We recently performed POP surgery and repair in 37 patients using laparoscopic pectopexy, a new technique for apical prolapse surgery, in women with advanced POP. The surgery was performed by a single surgeon at a single institute. The methods of operation were divided into total laparoscopic hysterectomy with pectopexy, supracervical hysterectomy with pectopexy or pectopexy alone, with additional anterior or posterior colporrhaphy selectively performed. All patients were analyzed in terms of age, body mass index, parity, estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months after surgery, and the short-term clinical outcomes were analyzed. All operations were performed successfully and without severe intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean EBL was 84 mL, and the mean operation time was 121 minutes. The operation satisfaction rates were high in most patients. All patients had no recurrence of apical prolapse, de novo urgency, frequency, incontinence, de novo constipation, or ileus. In our experience, laparoscopic pectopexy is a feasible method for apical prolapse repair as it does not have severe intraoperative or postoperative complications and de novo gastrointestinal complications. Considerable follow-up period for possible postoperative events is warranted.

Indexed as

ColporrhaphyPectopexyPelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID33423405
PMCPMC7797221
OpenAlexW3104667944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.