ArticleJournal of menopausal medicine2020
Effect of Hysterectomy on Ovarian Reserve in the Early Postoperative Period Based on the Type of Surgery.
Article in Journal of menopausal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of coenzyme Q10 pretreatment on ovarian reserve in women undergoing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Trial
- Initial Preoperative Hemoglobin Level Affects the Rate of Decline in Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels after Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy in Women with Ovarian Endometriosis.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2023Article
- Beyond Sterilization: A Comprehensive Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Preventative Strategy for Ovarian Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Multiple Protocols Combined with Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on the Maintenance of Ovarian Function in Patients After Ovarian Cystectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of simple hysterectomy on the ovarian reserve based on the type of surgery.
methodsEighty-six premenopausal women between 31 and 48 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease without additional adnexal surgery at a university hospital participated in this study. Seventy-one patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and 15 patients underwent abdominal hysterectomy (AH). Blood samples were obtained from all study participants on preoperative day and 3 days after the operation to determine the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels.
resultsThe postoperative reduction of the mean serum AMH level in the LAVH group (0.42 ± 0.76 ng/mL) was greater than that in the AH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (0.01 ± 0.60 ng/mL) (
conclusionsThese preliminary results suggest that simple hysterectomy affects the early postoperative decline of ovarian reserve, and these results might vary depending on the type of surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.