Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423324›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2021

Dynamic Transcriptional and Epigenetic Changes Drive Cellular Plasticity in the Liver.

Allyson J Merrell, Tao Peng, Jinyang Li, Kathryn Sun, Bin Li, Takeshi Katsuda, Markus Grompe, Kai Tan, Ben Z Stanger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic activation and dual roles of SOX9Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The yin and yang of pioneer transcription factors: Dual roles in repression and activation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. CD24Cell & bioscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allyson J Merrell *Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Tao Peng *Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Jinyang LiDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8125-6603
Kathryn SunDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Bin LiPapé Family Pediatric Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Takeshi KatsudaDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-3960-033X
Markus GrompePapé Family Pediatric Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Kai TanDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Ben Z StangerDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-0410-4037
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Data Analysis UnitU2CCA233285 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI TAN, KAI · 2018 to 2023
$13.2M
Mechanisms of bile duct reprogrammingR01DK083355 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GROMPE, MARKUS, STANGER, BEN Z · 2009 to 2020
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233285NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFollowing liver injury, a fraction of hepatocytes adopt features of biliary epithelial cells (BECs) in a process known as biliary reprogramming. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular events accompanying this dramatic shift in cellular identity. APPROACH AND

resultsWe applied the techniques of bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-seq, and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing to define the epigenetic and transcriptional changes associated with biliary reprogramming. In addition, we examined the role of TGF-β signaling by profiling cells undergoing reprogramming in mice with hepatocyte-specific deletion in the downstream TGF-β signaling component mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (Smad4). Biliary reprogramming followed a stereotyped pattern of altered gene expression consisting of robust induction of biliary genes and weaker repression of hepatocyte genes. These changes in gene expression were accompanied by corresponding modifications at the chromatin level. Although some reprogrammed cells had molecular features of "fully differentiated" BECs, most lacked some biliary characteristics and retained some hepatocyte characteristics. Surprisingly, single-cell analysis of Smad4 mutant mice revealed a dramatic increase in reprogramming.

conclusionHepatocytes undergo widespread chromatin and transcriptional changes during biliary reprogramming, resulting in epigenetic and gene expression profiles that are similar to, but distinct from, native BECs. Reprogramming involves a progressive accumulation of biliary molecular features without discrete intermediates. Paradoxically, canonical TGF-β signaling through Smad4 appears to constrain biliary reprogramming, indicating that TGF-β can either promote or inhibit biliary differentiation depending on which downstream components of the pathway are engaged. This work has implications for the formation of BECs and bile ducts in the adult liver.

Indexed as

AnimalsBile DuctsCell DifferentiationCell PlasticityEpigenesis, GeneticEpithelial CellsHepatocytesHumansLiverLiver RegenerationMaleMiceMice, TransgenicRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisSmad4 ProteinSmad4 ProteinSmad4 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID33423324
PMCPMC8271088
OpenAlexW3119139808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.