ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021
Investigation of causative factors for unusual shape of macula in eyes with macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Detachment: Prognostic Biomarkers, Surgical Planning, and Postoperative Monitoring.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How should we report the foveal status in eyes with "macula-off" retinal detachment?Eye (London, England) · 2023Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the factors significantly associated with anterior protrusion of the macula in eyes with a macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to determine the relationship between the intraretinal cystoid cavities (ICCs) and the anterior protrusion and function of the fovea. STUDY
designRetrospective cross-sectional study.
methodsSixty-nine eyes of 69 patients with successfully reattached macula-off RRD were retrospectively analyzed. Six radial spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images were used to evaluate the effects of the ICCs on detached macula and to measure the angle of the retina at the macula as a parameter to evaluate the anterior protrusion of the detached retina. The findings were compared to other parameters.
resultsThe mean angle of the retina at the macula was 143.1 ± 15.9° with a range of 108 to 172°. Preoperatively, 51 eyes (74%) had ICCs in the inner nuclear layer and/or the outer plexiform layer and Henle fiber layer complex, but none was present after surgery. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the angle of the retina was significantly associated with the presence of ICCs (β = -0.637, P<0.001) and the height of subretinal fluid (β = -0.256, P = 0.005). Eyes with ICCs had poorer preoperative vision (P<0.001), narrower angle of the retina (P<0.001), and thicker subretinal fluid (P<0.001) than eyes without cavities.
conclusionsThe anterior protrusion in eyes with macula-off RRD is associated with the presence of ICCs. The presence of ICCs can affect preoperative function and morphology but does not affect postoperative function and morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.