Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423132›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Ultrasound-based internal carotid artery plaque characterization using deep learning paradigm on a supercomputer: a cardiovascular disease/stroke risk assessment system.

Luca Saba, Skandha S Sanagala, Suneet K Gupta, Vijaya K Koppula, Amer M Johri, Aditya M Sharma, Raghu Kolluri, Deepak L Bhatt, Andrew Nicolaides, Jasjit S Suri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU), Cagliari, Italy.
Skandha S SanagalaCSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India.
Suneet K GuptaCSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India.
Vijaya K KoppulaCSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India.
Amer M JohriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Aditya M SharmaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Raghu KolluriOhioHealth Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH, USA.
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-6245
Andrew NicolaidesVascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Jasjit S SuriStroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA. jasjit.suri@atheropoint.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-396X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual or manual characterization and classification of atherosclerotic plaque lesions are tedious, error-prone, and time-consuming. The purpose of this study is to develop and design an automated carotid plaque characterization and classification system into binary classes, namely symptomatic and asymptomatic types via the deep learning (DL) framework implemented on a supercomputer. We hypothesize that on ultrasound images, symptomatic carotid plaques have (a) a low grayscale median because of a histologically large lipid core and relatively little collagen and calcium, and (b) a higher chaotic (heterogeneous) grayscale distribution due to the composition. The methodology consisted of building a DL model of Artificial Intelligence (called Atheromatic 2.0, AtheroPoint, CA, USA) that used a classic convolution neural network consisting of 13 layers and implemented on a supercomputer. The DL model used a cross-validation protocol for estimating the classification accuracy (ACC) and area-under-the-curve (AUC). A sample of 346 carotid ultrasound-based delineated plaques were used (196 symptomatic and 150 asymptomatic, mean age 69.9 ± 7.8 years, with 39% females). This was augmented using geometric transformation yielding 2312 plaques (1191 symptomatic and 1120 asymptomatic plaques). K10 (90% training and 10% testing) cross-validation DL protocol was implemented and showed an (i) accuracy and (ii) AUC without and with augmentation of 86.17%, 0.86 (p-value < 0.0001), and 89.7%, 0.91 (p-value < 0.0001), respectively. The DL characterization system consisted of validation of the two hypotheses: (a) mean feature strength (MFS) and (b) Mandelbrot's fractal dimension (FD) for measuring chaotic behavior. We demonstrated that both MFS and FD were higher in symptomatic plaques compared to asymptomatic plaques by 64.15 ± 0.73% (p-value < 0.0001) and 6 ± 0.13% (p-value < 0.0001), respectively. The benchmarking results show that DL with augmentation (ACC: 89.7%, AUC: 0.91 (p-value < 0.0001)) is superior to previously published machine learning (ACC: 83.7%) by 6.0%. The Atheromatic runs the test patient in < 2 s. Deep learning can be a useful tool for carotid ultrasound-based characterization and classification of symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCarotid StenosisDeep LearningPlaque, AtheroscleroticStrokeAgedArtificial IntelligenceCarotid ArteriesCarotid Artery, InternalFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentUltrasonographyAccuracyAnd speedArtificial intelligenceAsymptomaticAtherosclerosisCarotid plaqueDeep learningMachine learningPerformanceSupercomputerSymptomaticUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.