ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2021
A narrative review of the last decade's literature on the diagnostic accuracy of septic arthritis of the native joint.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decision-making after joint aspiration: C-reactive protein and synovial white blood cell count as laboratory indicators for surgical joint lavage in pediatric septic arthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Diagnostic parameters in native joint septic arthritis and development of a new evaluation score.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2026Article
- Ten-Year Experience with Native Joint Septic Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy for Septic Arthritis Through Multivariate Analysis of Serum and Synovial Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Performance evaluation of a commercial multiplex pathogen panel for the diagnosis of pediatric joint infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Prospective evaluation of real-world performance and clinical impact of the Biofire FilmArray joint infection panel.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Impact of septic arthritis on quality of life: arthroscopy vs. arthrotomy.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of Preoperative Antibiotic Therapy on Operative Culture Yield for Diagnosis of Native Joint Septic Arthritis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Incidence and Prevalence of Septic Arthritis in Thailand: A Database from the Ministry of Public Health.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2023Article
- Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Review
- Staphylococcus aureus-induced septic arthritis of the ankle related to malum perforans in a diabetes patient.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While septic arthritis can be a straightforward diagnosis, there are many cases when the diagnosis is difficult to make. The aim of this study was to review the last decade's literature on the diagnosis of septic arthritis of the native joint in adults and summarize that data in an easy to follow algorithm to clarify how the last decade's data may be applied to the diagnosis of septic arthritis. A search of PubMed and CINAHL databases was performed to identify studies that compared results diagnostic tests for septic arthritis. We cross referenced this search with searches of additional databases (including Cochrane Library and Scopus) to confirm similar search results. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool was used by two independent reviewers to determine study quality and risk of bias. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to the initial search, 15 papers total were included for analysis. All 15 papers were of high quality methodology as determined by the QUADAS tool. There were 26 different diagnostics tests used across the 15 papers included for review. Three of those diagnostic tests had specificity and sensitivity greater than 80%. Eight tests had a positive likelihood ratio of ≥10. Three tests had a negative likelihood ratio < 0.1, indicating that they may help to rule out septic arthritis. A flowchart was created to summarize the findings of our review, so that physicians may reference this visual in making the appropriate diagnosis when the commonly held standards of cell count, gram stain, and culture aren't enough to make the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.