Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423078›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021

Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Lang Li, Xue Zhao, Xiaodong Yang, Lei Yang, Fei Xing, Xueyang Tang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Periprosthetic fractures: an unrecognized osteoporosis crisis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lang LiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Xue ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaodong YangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Lei YangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Fei XingDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Xueyang TangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. xueyangtwch@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-4534
Sichuan University · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

International cooperation project of Sichuan provincial science and technology department 2019YFS0265Post-Doctor Research Project of Sichuan University 2019SCU12034Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2018HXBH076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHemiarthroplasty is commonly used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures in older patients. However, there is no consensus on the use of cement during hemiarthroplasty. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to focus on the outcomes of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in older patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid were searched for studies related comparison of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 20, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.2 software.

resultsEleven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Cemented hemiarthroplasty was found to be superior to uncemented arthroplasty with respect to reoperation rate (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.38-0.96, p = 0.03), complications related to prosthesis (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.68, p = 0.0008), residual pain (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83, p = 0.0004), and operation time (MD 8.22, 95% CI 6.30-10.14, p < 0.00001). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to local and general complications, duration of hospital stay, hip function, and mortality.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis showed cemented hemiarthroplasty might be an optimum choice for treating unstable femoral neck fractures in older patients. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted cautiously owing to some limitations. Further studies are required to provide more robust evidence.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone CementsHemiarthroplastyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesFemurHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBone CementsCementedFemoral neck fracturesHemiarthroplastyMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID33423078
OpenAlexW3120772239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.