Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33423039›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2021

Induced defense response in red mango fruit against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.

Pradeep Kumar Sudheeran, Noa Sela, Mira Carmeli-Weissberg, Rinat Ovadia, Sayantan Panda, Oleg Feygenberg, Dalia Maurer, Michal Oren-Shamir, Asaph Aharoni, Noam Alkan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anthocyanins fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of ABA in the Interaction between Citrus Fruit andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Plant Hormones in the Interaction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pradeep Kumar SudheeranDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 15159, HaMaccabim Road 68, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Noa SelaDepartment of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, ARO, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Mira Carmeli-WeissbergDepartment of Fruit Tree Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan, 7505101, Israel.
Rinat OvadiaDepartment of Ornamental Plants and Agricultural Biotechnology, ARO, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 15159, HaMaccabim Road 68, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Sayantan PandaDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel.
Oleg FeygenbergDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 15159, HaMaccabim Road 68, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Dalia MaurerDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 15159, HaMaccabim Road 68, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Michal Oren-ShamirDepartment of Ornamental Plants and Agricultural Biotechnology, ARO, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 15159, HaMaccabim Road 68, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
Asaph AharoniDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel.
Noam AlkanDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 15159, HaMaccabim Road 68, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel. noamal@volcani.agri.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-6514
Agricultural Research Organization · ILWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Israeli Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) 20-14-0019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mango fruit exposed to sunlight develops red skin and are more resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses. Here we show that harvested red mango fruit that was exposed to sunlight at the orchard is more resistant than green fruit to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. LCMS analysis showed high amounts of antifungal compounds, as glycosylated flavonols, glycosylated anthocyanins, and mangiferin in red vs. green mango skin, correlated with higher antioxidant and lower ROS. However, also the green side of red mango fruit that has low levels of flavonoids was resistant, indicated induced resistance. Transcriptomes of red and green fruit inoculated on their red and green sides with C. gloeosporioides were analyzed. Overall, in red fruit skin, 2,187 genes were upregulated in response to C. gloeosporioides. On the green side of red mango, upregulation of 22 transcription factors and 33 signaling-related transcripts indicated induced resistance. The RNA-Seq analysis suggests that resistance of the whole red fruit involved upregulation of ethylene, brassinosteroid, and phenylpropanoid pathways. To conclude, red fruit resistance to fungal pathogen was related to both flavonoid toxicity and primed resistance of fruit that was exposed to light at the orchard.

Identifiers

PMID33423039
PMCPMC7797005
OpenAlexW3120985783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.