Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33422827›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2021

Sooner than you think: A very early affective reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine in Argentina.

F Torrente, A Yoris, D M Low, P Lopez, P Bekinschtein, F Manes, M Cetkovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F TorrenteInstitute of Neuroscience and Public Policy, INECO Foundation, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neurosciences, (INECO Foundation-Favaloro University-CONICET), Argentina.
A YorisInstitute of Neuroscience and Public Policy, INECO Foundation, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neurosciences, (INECO Foundation-Favaloro University-CONICET), Argentina.
D M LowProgram in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School & MIT, USA.
P LopezInstitute of Neuroscience and Public Policy, INECO Foundation, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neurosciences, (INECO Foundation-Favaloro University-CONICET), Argentina.
P BekinschteinInstitute of Neuroscience and Public Policy, INECO Foundation, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neurosciences, (INECO Foundation-Favaloro University-CONICET), Argentina.
F ManesInstitute of Neuroscience and Public Policy, INECO Foundation, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neurosciences, (INECO Foundation-Favaloro University-CONICET), Argentina.
M CetkovichInstitute of Neuroscience and Public Policy, INECO Foundation, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neurosciences, (INECO Foundation-Favaloro University-CONICET), Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic pose serious challenges to mood stability and emotional regulation at all ages. Although many people tend to react resiliently to stress, others appear to display emotional anxiety and depression-related symptoms. In this study, we carried out a survey (N = 10,053) during the first week of the general lockdown (quarantine) in Argentina to measure early affective reactions in Argentine adults. Respondents showed substantial anxious and depressive symptoms, with 33% and 23% of participants reporting possible depressive and anxious syndromes, respectively, with the youngest group (18 to 25 y.o.) showing the highest prevalence of symptoms. Even if prior mental health problems predisposed or aggravated the reaction, participants without prior complaints showed signs of psychological impact. Using linear regression, the most important independent variables related to depressive symptoms were the feeling of loneliness followed by daily stress. In the case of anxious states, the strongest variables were negative repetitive thinking and feeling of loneliness. Other psychological, economic, and social factors are discussed. This study is in line with previous literature that highlight the importance of the psychological impact of pandemics, but additionally demonstrates that these reactions are present at a large scale immediately after the start of quarantine with very low infectious rates as an early anticipatory adaptive reaction leading to potential negative outcomes from adjustment disorders to major disorders. In addition, the present results provide potentially relevant information about sudden environmental impacts on affective states and specific pathways for anxiety and depression to be expressed. We end by discussing implications for public policy based on considering the most vulnerable groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultAnxietyArgentinaCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionHumansMental HealthQuarantineSARS-CoV-2Stress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID33422827
PMCPMC8529255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.