Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33422579›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2021

Effects of US state preemption laws on infant mortality.

Douglas A Wolf, Shannon M Monnat, Jennifer Karas Montez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in US State Public Health Emergency Laws, 2021-2022.American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  7. U.S. State Preemption Laws and Working-Age Mortality.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas A WolfDepartment of Public Administration and International Affairs, Aging Studies Institute, and Center for Policy Research, 314 Lyman Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, United States of America. Electronic address: dawolf@syr.edu.
Shannon M MonnatDepartment of Sociology, Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion, Center for Policy Research, and Aging Studies Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.
Jennifer Karas MontezDepartment of Sociology, Aging Studies Institute, and Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.

Funding

Network on Life Course Health Dynamics and Disparities in 21st Century America RenewalR24AG045061 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, Sarah A. Burgard · 2014 to 2026
$5.2M
Center for Aging and Policy Studies (CAPS) Core D: External Research Resources Support and Dissemination CoreP30AG066583 · NIA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI WILMOTH, JANET M · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Interdisciplinary Network on Rural Population Health and AgingR24AG065159 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JENSEN, LEIF · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Program Development CoreP30AG034464 · NIA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI WILMOTH, JANET · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034464NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066583NIA NIH HHS R24 AG045061NIA NIH HHS R24 AG065159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies show that raising the minimum wage in a US state above the federal minimum wage can reduce infant mortality rates in those states. Some states have raised their minimum wage in recent decades, while many others did not, and have prohibited local authorities from doing so by enacting preemption laws. This study investigates how the recent emergence of state preemption laws that remove local authority to raise the minimum wage has affected infant mortality rates. Using county- and state- level data spanning 2001 through 2018, this study models infant mortality rates as a function of minimum wage levels, controlling for confounders. The estimated model, combined with information on the timing, location, and level of preempted minimum wages, is then used to estimate the number of infant deaths that occurred in 2018 that could be attributed to state preemption of local minimum wage increases. In the 9 largest (pop. > 250,000) metro counties most directly affected by state preemption, we estimate that in 2018, 25 infant deaths were attributable to preemption. This equates to a 5.4% reduction in these counties' infant mortality rate. When considering all large metro counties in preemption states, as many as 605 infant deaths could be attributed to preemption. State preemption laws that remove local authority to enact health-promoting legislation, such as minimum wage increases, are a significant threat to population health. The growing tide of these laws, particularly since 2010, may be contributing to recent troubling trends in US life expectancy.

Indexed as

IncomeInfant MortalityHumansInfantState GovernmentUnited StatesInfant mortalityMinimum wagePreemption

Identifiers

PMID33422579
PMCPMC7956067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.