ArticlePreventive medicine2021
Effects of US state preemption laws on infant mortality.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical discussion of recently published claims of a causal relationship between bat decline and infant mortality.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Bats, bugs, and babies: why stringent guidelines are needed for cause-and-effect interpretation in epidemiological studies.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Court-mandated redistricting and disparities in infant mortality and deaths of despair.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Measuring variation in infant mortality and deaths of despair by US congressional district in Pennsylvania: a methodological case study.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- US State Policy Contexts and Population Health.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- Trends in US State Public Health Emergency Laws, 2021-2022.American journal of public health · 2023Article
- U.S. State Preemption Laws and Working-Age Mortality.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- The impact of minimum wage on parental time allocation to children: evidence from the American Time Use Survey.Review of economics of the household · 2022Article
- Empirical evidence on structural racism as a driver of racial inequities in COVID-19 mortality.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- From convergence to divergence: Lifespan variation in US states, 1959-2017.SSM - population health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies show that raising the minimum wage in a US state above the federal minimum wage can reduce infant mortality rates in those states. Some states have raised their minimum wage in recent decades, while many others did not, and have prohibited local authorities from doing so by enacting preemption laws. This study investigates how the recent emergence of state preemption laws that remove local authority to raise the minimum wage has affected infant mortality rates. Using county- and state- level data spanning 2001 through 2018, this study models infant mortality rates as a function of minimum wage levels, controlling for confounders. The estimated model, combined with information on the timing, location, and level of preempted minimum wages, is then used to estimate the number of infant deaths that occurred in 2018 that could be attributed to state preemption of local minimum wage increases. In the 9 largest (pop. > 250,000) metro counties most directly affected by state preemption, we estimate that in 2018, 25 infant deaths were attributable to preemption. This equates to a 5.4% reduction in these counties' infant mortality rate. When considering all large metro counties in preemption states, as many as 605 infant deaths could be attributed to preemption. State preemption laws that remove local authority to enact health-promoting legislation, such as minimum wage increases, are a significant threat to population health. The growing tide of these laws, particularly since 2010, may be contributing to recent troubling trends in US life expectancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.