Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33422065›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

Mapping experiences and perspectives of equity in international health collaborations: a scoping review.

Marlyn C Faure, Nchangwi S Munung, Ntobeko A B Ntusi, Bridget Pratt, Jantina de Vries

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marlyn C FaureDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. marlyn.faure@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-8925
Nchangwi S MunungDivision of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ntobeko A B NtusiDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bridget PrattCentre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jantina de VriesDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 219600/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhilst global health research often involves international collaborations, achieving or promoting equity within collaborations remains a key challenge, despite established conceptual approaches and the development of frameworks and guidelines to promote equity. There have also been several empirical studies documenting researchers' experiences of inequity and views on what is required to advance equity in global health collaborations. While these empirical studies provide critical insights, there has been no attempt to systematically synthetize what constitutes equity and how it can be achieved. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of qualitative studies, opinion and editorial pieces about what equity is and how it can be promoted in international collaborations.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to explore domains of equity in international health collaborations. This review included qualitative studies and opinion pieces or editorial pieces on equity in international health collaborations. We mapped the data and identified common themes using a thematic analysis approach.

resultsThis initial search retrieved a total of 7611 papers after removing duplicates. A total of 11 papers were included in this review, 10 empirical studies and 1 editorial piece. We conducted our search between October - November 2019. We identified 10 key domains which are important for promoting equity in international collaborations: funding; capacity building; authorship; sample ownership and export; trust; research agreement; acknowledging inequality; recognition and communication. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that for international collaborations to be considered more equitable, it must at least consider the 10 domains we highlighted. The 10 domains map onto five key aspects of social justice theory, namely avoiding unequal power relations like subordination, group recognition and affirmation, promoting the well-being of all, inclusion in decision-making and ensuring self-development.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesCapacity BuildingGlobal HealthHealth EquityHealth PolicyHumansInternational CooperationQualitative ResearchSocial JusticeWorld Health OrganizationEquityGlobal healthInternational health collaborationsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID33422065
PMCPMC7796532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.