ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Computational Barthel Index: an automated tool for assessing and predicting activities of daily living among nursing home patients.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A clustering-based trajectory analytics of functional loss and recovery among older adults.PloS one · 2026Article
- Co-occurrence of depressive symptoms, risk of malnutrition, and functional limitations in chronically ill patients receiving long-term home care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Reliability and validity of the Geriatric Self-Care Scale among Chinese older adults.Annals of medicine · 2025Observational
- Factors influencing on functional independence outcomes after hospitalization and rehabilitation in children with spinal cord injury.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Neurological Health Conditions Using a Machine Learning Approach.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Development of an ontology to characterize mental functioning.Disability and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Exploring trajectories of functional decline and recovery among older adults: a data-driven approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multi-task learning for predicting quality-of-life and independence in activities of daily living after stroke: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The Use of Machine Learning for Inferencing the Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Program for Orthopedic and Neurological Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Detecting disabilities in everyday life: evidence from a geriatric assessment.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Article
- Infrared Monitoring of Oxygenation Process Generated by Robotic Verticalization in Bedridden People.IEEE sensors journal · 2021Article
- Influencing factors of self-perceived aging among empty nesters: a cross-sectional study.Revista CuidarteArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessment of functional ability, including activities of daily living (ADLs), is a manual process completed by skilled health professionals. In the presented research, an automated decision support tool, the Computational Barthel Index Tool (CBIT), was constructed that can automatically assess and predict probabilities of current and future ADLs based on patients' medical history.
methodsThe data used to construct the tool include the demographic information, inpatient and outpatient diagnosis codes, and reported disabilities of 181,213 residents of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) Community Living Centers. Supervised machine learning methods were applied to construct the CBIT. Temporal information about times from the first and the most recent occurrence of diagnoses was encoded. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to tune hyperparameters, and independent test sets were used to evaluate models using AUC, accuracy, recall and precision. Random forest achieved the best model quality. Models were calibrated using isotonic regression.
resultsThe unabridged version of CBIT uses 578 patient characteristics and achieved average AUC of 0.94 (0.93-0.95), accuracy of 0.90 (0.89-0.91), precision of 0.91 (0.89-0.92), and recall of 0.90 (0.84-0.95) when re-evaluating patients. CBIT is also capable of predicting ADLs up to one year ahead, with accuracy decreasing over time, giving average AUC of 0.77 (0.73-0.79), accuracy of 0.73 (0.69-0.80), precision of 0.74 (0.66-0.81), and recall of 0.69 (0.34-0.96). A simplified version of CBIT with 50 top patient characteristics reached performance that does not significantly differ from full CBIT.
conclusionDischarge planners, disability application reviewers and clinicians evaluating comparative effectiveness of treatments can use CBIT to assess and predict information on functional status of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.