Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33422039›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2021

A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being.

Johannes H De Kock, Helen Ann Latham, Stephen J Leslie, Mark Grindle, Sarah-Anne Munoz, Liz Ellis, Rob Polson, Christopher M O'Malley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 443 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
443citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

443 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of COVID-19 on Depression, Anxiety and Stress of Dental Students: A Systematic Review.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Surgical trainee burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. The Association of Moral Injury and Healthcare Clinicians' Wellbeing: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

383 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes H De KockUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK. hannes.dekock@uhi.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-5572
Helen Ann LathamNHS Highland, Nairn Healthcare Group, Cawdor Rd, Nairn, IV12 5EE, UK.
Stephen J LeslieNHS Highland, NHS Highland Cardiac Unit Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, IV2 3UJ, UK.
Mark GrindleUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
Sarah-Anne MunozUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
Liz EllisUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
Rob PolsonUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
Christopher M O'MalleyUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate Rapid COVID-19 response: UHI/Portfolio
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth and social care workers (HSCWs) have carried a heavy burden during the COVID-19 crisis and, in the challenge to control the virus, have directly faced its consequences. Supporting their psychological wellbeing continues, therefore, to be a priority. This rapid review was carried out to establish whether there are any identifiable risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes amongst HSCWs during the COVID-19 crisis.

methodsWe undertook a rapid review of the literature following guidelines by the WHO and the Cochrane Collaboration's recommendations. We searched across 14 databases, executing the search at two different time points. We included published, observational and experimental studies that reported the psychological effects on HSCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsThe 24 studies included in this review reported data predominantly from China (18 out of 24 included studies) and most sampled urban hospital staff. Our study indicates that COVID-19 has a considerable impact on the psychological wellbeing of front-line hospital staff. Results suggest that nurses may be at higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during this pandemic, but no studies compare this group with the primary care workforce. Furthermore, no studies investigated the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social care staff. Other risk factors identified were underlying organic illness, gender (female), concern about family, fear of infection, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and close contact with COVID-19. Systemic support, adequate knowledge and resilience were identified as factors protecting against adverse mental health outcomes.

conclusionsThe evidence to date suggests that female nurses with close contact with COVID-19 patients may have the most to gain from efforts aimed at supporting psychological well-being. However, inconsistencies in findings and a lack of data collected outside of hospital settings, suggest that we should not exclude any groups when addressing psychological well-being in health and social care workers. Whilst psychological interventions aimed at enhancing resilience in the individual may be of benefit, it is evident that to build a resilient workforce, occupational and environmental factors must be addressed. Further research including social care workers and analysis of wider societal structural factors is recommended.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelHumansMental DisordersRisk FactorsCOVID-19FrontlineHealthcareInterventionMental healthPsychologyReviewSocial careStaffWorkers

Identifiers

PMID33422039
PMCPMC7794640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.